Reverse order of arguments for ap#833
Merged
Merged
Conversation
5 tasks
Closed
Contributor
|
Seems reasonable to me. 👍 |
Contributor
|
Looks good. 👍 as long as the build passes. |
Current coverage is
|
ceedubs
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2016
Reverse order of arguments for ap
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a follow-up to #821 that rebases @lukewyman's changes, makes some fixes supported by the new version of Simulacrum, and updates the docs.
Note that I've renamed
aponCartesianBuilderNtoapWithto avoid confusion (since the function comes after the arguments in that case).