-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 346
Added GLM Modeling #2170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Added GLM Modeling #2170
Conversation
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to llm-compressor. Please add the ready label when the PR is ready for review. Note: This is required to complete the testing suite, please only add the label once the PR is code complete and local testing has been performed. |
Summary of ChangesHello @phaelon74, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a specialized calibration module for GLM4 Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models within the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds support for GLM MoE model calibration by introducing CalibrationGlm4MoeMoE. The implementation correctly handles passing all tokens to all experts during calibration, which is crucial for accurate quantization. My feedback includes a suggestion to refactor the forward method to improve maintainability and a strong recommendation to add unit tests for this new functionality to ensure its correctness and prevent future regressions.
|
Nice, you frontrunned me! I was tired of waiting for Transformers v5 before doing proper all experts calibration of GLM-4.7 / GLM-4.5-Air / GLM-4.6V (see #2036). Not doing so can have a dramatic impact and many models out there just use raw LLM compressors (mine included): https://avtc.github.io/aquarium-side-by-side/
|
|
By the way, does this PR work on the vision models as-is like GLM-4.6V? |
It should handle it yes, schematically, but I can run it through the test script later tonight and tell you for certain. |
d2a0c7a to
cd19d29
Compare
|
I believe this is now ready for formal review, after having resolved the issues and added a testing script with results. This is my first PR, so if I missed anything, apologies. |
Signed-off-by: phaelon74 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: phaelon74 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: phaelon74 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: phaelon74 <[email protected]>
cd19d29 to
f02b1be
Compare

SUMMARY:
Without a model file for GLM, only experts activated from a calibaration sample, are used. This means accuracy will drop quite a bit if the dataset is not robust and even with a robust dataset, I highly doubt all experts are being hit and pulled from as needed.
With this model file, it should cycle through all experts like Qwen does with it's model files, etc.
TEST PLAN:
I used LLM_Compressor to quant GLM4.7 and it succeeded without issue. Equally I quanted a llama3 model as well, to make sure it didn't break any other flows.