Skip to content

Conversation

@zifeitong
Copy link
Contributor

@zifeitong zifeitong commented Aug 6, 2024

@DarkLight1337 It's good to be reviewed now. I am following #7122 and not adding a new axis to input shape as outlined in #4194 (comment). Let me know what do you think.

Reference: #4194 (comment), #7122, #7392

BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE


PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2024

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which consists a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of default ones by unblocking the steps in your fast-check build on Buildkite UI.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, please make sure to run full CI as it is required to merge (or just use auto-merge).

To run full CI, you can do one of these:

  • Comment /ready on the PR
  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

Quick heads-up that #7126 has been merged.

@zifeitong zifeitong marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2024 17:39
Copy link
Member

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some initial comments.



@pytest.mark.parametrize("model", ["llava-hf/llava-v1.6-mistral-7b-hf"])
def test_repeat_and_pad_image_tokens(model):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this sanity check!

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

DarkLight1337 commented Aug 21, 2024

I am following #7122 and not adding a new axis to input shape as outlined in #4194 (comment). Let me know what do you think.

We can keep this for now since it's not breaking anything. A separate PR can be opened to address this if the need arises.

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 changed the title [Model] Add multi-image input support for LLaVA-Next offline inference [Model] Add multi-image input support for LLaVA-Next offline inference Aug 22, 2024
@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

VLM tests are failing

@zifeitong
Copy link
Contributor Author

VLM tests are failing

The issue is phi3v uses more than 1 placeholder stings (<image_1>, <image_2>, ...), and breaks the placeholder padding function. It should work after #7783 is merged.

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

Do you prefer to wait for #7783 or just copy the original CLIP padding code into phi3v?

@zifeitong
Copy link
Contributor Author

zifeitong commented Aug 24, 2024

Do you prefer to wait for #7783 or just copy the original CLIP padding code into phi3v?

It looks like #7783 will be merged soon. I'll rebase my PR once it's merged and rerun the tests.

@zifeitong
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ready

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Aug 26, 2024
@zifeitong
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DarkLight1337 All tests passed. PTAL when you get a chance.

Copy link
Member

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again for implementing this!

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 merged commit 5340a2d into vllm-project:main Aug 27, 2024
Alvant pushed a commit to compressa-ai/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2024
Alvant pushed a commit to compressa-ai/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2024
LeiWang1999 pushed a commit to LeiWang1999/vllm-bitblas that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
LeiWang1999 pushed a commit to LeiWang1999/vllm-bitblas that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants