-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
[Model] Add multi-image input support for LLaVA-Next offline inference #7230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Model] Add multi-image input support for LLaVA-Next offline inference #7230
Conversation
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. Once the PR is approved and ready to go, please make sure to run full CI as it is required to merge (or just use auto-merge). To run full CI, you can do one of these:
🚀 |
b2ad33e to
124c946
Compare
|
Quick heads-up that #7126 has been merged. |
124c946 to
c700350
Compare
ed43442 to
9ca6e00
Compare
9ca6e00 to
b4a0bcc
Compare
DarkLight1337
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some initial comments.
tests/multimodal/test_image.py
Outdated
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.parametrize("model", ["llava-hf/llava-v1.6-mistral-7b-hf"]) | ||
| def test_repeat_and_pad_image_tokens(model): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding this sanity check!
We can keep this for now since it's not breaking anything. A separate PR can be opened to address this if the need arises. |
Co-authored-by: Cyrus Leung <[email protected]>
7c8f82f to
723d727
Compare
00a8d2c to
95275b1
Compare
|
VLM tests are failing |
The issue is phi3v uses more than 1 placeholder stings (<image_1>, <image_2>, ...), and breaks the placeholder padding function. It should work after #7783 is merged. |
|
Do you prefer to wait for #7783 or just copy the original CLIP padding code into phi3v? |
|
/ready |
|
@DarkLight1337 All tests passed. PTAL when you get a chance. |
DarkLight1337
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks again for implementing this!
…project#7230 (vllm-project#7948) Signed-off-by: Alvant <[email protected]>
vllm-project#7230) Signed-off-by: LeiWang1999 <[email protected]>
…project#7230 (vllm-project#7948) Signed-off-by: LeiWang1999 <[email protected]>
@DarkLight1337 It's good to be reviewed now. I am following #7122 and not adding a new axis to input shape as outlined in #4194 (comment). Let me know what do you think.
Reference: #4194 (comment), #7122, #7392
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]for bug fixes.[CI/Build]for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLMclass, etc.)[Kernel]for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine,AsyncLLMEngine,Scheduler, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]).[Misc]for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
format.shto format your code.docs/source/if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-requiredand might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-requiredlabel on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!