[SGLang] Add support between mcore0.11 and sglang

[BearBiscuit05]

Based on the ongoing alignment between mcore and vllm #851 , I believe we can simultaneously advance the alignment between mcore and sglang, as their interfaces are similar. In the end, we will only need to obtain a generator parameter. link

[coderkaka]

Based on the ongoing alignment between mcore and vllm #851 , I believe we can simultaneously advance the alignment between mcore and sglang, as their interfaces are similar. In the end, we will only need to obtain a generator parameter. link

Hi, BearBiscuit05, Could you confirm if this code commit has successfully cleared the preliminary QA validation and is currently functioning as intended in the test environment?

[BearBiscuit05]

Hello, this code currently cannot run. The mcore runtime environment requires PyTorch 2.6, but SGLang has issues in this environment.

[coderkaka]

Hello, this code currently cannot run. The mcore runtime environment requires PyTorch 2.6, but SGLang has issues in this environment.

Thank you for your kind reply. I read the code, but found that it does not take expert parallelism into account. Will this be supported in the future?

[BearBiscuit05]

Hello, this code currently cannot run. The mcore runtime environment requires PyTorch 2.6, but SGLang has issues in this environment.

Thank you for your kind reply. I read the code, but found that it does not take expert parallelism into account. Will this be supported in the future?

Yes, mcore in verl is no support for ep yet, and future plans will depend on the progress of mcore.

[zhaochenyang20]

LGTM

[FrankLeeeee]

@zhaochenyang20 LGTM.

[vermouth1992]

Shall we merge this @ocss884 @zhaochenyang20?

[zhaochenyang20]

@BearBiscuit05 @vermouth1992 thanks so much for help！

[ocss884]

Shall we merge this @ocss884 @zhaochenyang20?

Yes, LGTM