Skip to content

Problematic wording in expansion algorithm #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
kasei opened this issue May 20, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #101
Closed

Problematic wording in expansion algorithm #91

kasei opened this issue May 20, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #101

Comments

@kasei
Copy link
Contributor

kasei commented May 20, 2019

The wording of part 9 of the Expansion algorithm is confusing. I suspect it may have a typo. It starts out discussing the initialization of a dictionary nests (which #8 directly preceding does as a single algorithmic item), but then goes on to mention a second variable input type. The wording for what to do with this second variable is unclear, but then there's a huge set of sub-items under #9 that seems to have very little to do with nests.

Initialize an empty dictionary, nests, and input type to the last value of any member expanding to @type. For each key and value in element, ordered lexicographically by key if ordered is true:

How does input type relate to nests?
Should the for each here be a new item #10?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant