Skip to content

Reject empty term #421

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Reject empty term #421

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

@pchampin pchampin commented Mar 16, 2020


💥 Error: write EPROTO 140222018242432:error:1407742E:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:tlsv1 alert protocol version:../deps/openssl/openssl/ssl/s23_clnt.c:772:

💥 ###

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Mar 16, 2020, 11:38 PM UTC).

More

PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:

🚨 HTML Diff Service - The HTML Diff Service is used to create HTML diffs of the spec changes suggested in a pull request.

🔗 Related URL

If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.

My goal was to avoid changing the step numbering.
The drawback is that the two operations in this if-otherwise
may seem only vaguely related...
@pchampin
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR addresses #379

@pchampin pchampin requested a review from gkellogg March 16, 2020 19:00
@gkellogg gkellogg requested a review from davidlehn March 16, 2020 20:43
@davidlehn
Copy link
Contributor

Need to add the same toRdf test. Also "e052" will bump into the recursion test PR naming. May be easier to handle that here with less tests to rename?

Sad to see such a nice obfuscated json-ld feature get testsuited away.

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

Need to add the same toRdf test. Also "e052" will bump into the recursion test PR naming. May be easier to handle that here with less tests to rename?

Yes, we should compare with other PRs and rename as appropriate, and add a toRdf version. (It would be nice to have a way to not have to do this manually!)

Sad to see such a nice obfuscated json-ld feature get testsuited away.

👍 But, that's what the spec says to do; perhaps 2.0 can roll that back.

@gkellogg gkellogg merged commit 5e5555c into master Mar 17, 2020
@gkellogg gkellogg deleted the reject_empty_term branch March 17, 2020 18:32
@@ -5353,6 +5353,27 @@ <h2>
</dd>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt id='te052'>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missed an html rebuild.

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

I'm rebuilding them all as part of PR #416.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants