-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
"Framing" is an unfortunate choice of verb #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@dlongley is there a paragraph we could add to the introduction that would motivate the use of the term "framing" to describe this process? |
Maybe something along these lines (which would also tie it into Adrian's concerns):
|
Excellent text, Dave, thanks! |
Per the WG resolution, we cannot change the name at this stage, but can add text explaining why that name was chosen. This issue can thus be closed when #17 is merged. |
In reviewing the 1.1 spec I was surprised to discover that "framing" is not the process of surrounding JSON-LD data with a "frame". In my experience this is the most common definition of framing in a technical context.
i.e. Using special delimiters or length prefixes around a chunk of data that "frames" that data and differentiates one chunk from another when streamed between processes.
This is the definition I am accustomed to and I wonder if I am alone in being surprised that JSON-LD framing appears to be used to define a structure as opposed to a frame.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: