-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Added the example for bushes #209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
282c566
Added the example for bushes
iherman 8133468
Update index.html
iherman 028bc09
Update index.html
iherman c2b666e
Update index.html
iherman 03949a3
Update and fix examples.
gkellogg eea1017
Add note in named graphs on the use of `@included` in preference to `…
gkellogg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this true? This seems like the use case for
{"@context": {}, "@graph": [ ... ]}
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
e.g.: http://tinyurl.com/y54yasoh
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, yes, the solution so far to the problem is to use
@graph
. But it turns out that@included
can play exactly the same role, except that using that keyword (instead of@graph
) is cleaner. The problem with using@graph
for something like that is that it looks like we are talking about a dataset when, in fact, we are not!B.t.w., and that is relevant, the example is almost exactly the same is a few chapter below (example 111 in the PR) where datasets/named graphs are described. But there is difference between named graphs (or data sets) and a single graph which can then be handled via
@included
.B.t.w., and I forgot to do that: if we agree with this PR, then the text around 111 should be redone. Of course, 111 remains valid due to backward compatibility reasons but I would propose that the
@included
should be promoted instead.