Skip to content

Improve language around datatype coercion. #73

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2018
Merged

Improve language around datatype coercion. #73

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2018

Conversation

gkellogg
Copy link
Member

@gkellogg gkellogg commented Sep 28, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Fixes #38.

(added manually)
Preview

@gkellogg gkellogg requested a review from iherman September 28, 2018 20:43
ajs6f
ajs6f approved these changes Sep 28, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@ajs6f ajs6f left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know enough about the CSS to have a useful opinion, but the wording changes seem to me to be a definite improvement.

@gkellogg gkellogg merged commit eb61149 into master Oct 1, 2018
@gkellogg gkellogg deleted the coercion branch October 1, 2018 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ajs6f ajs6f ajs6f approved these changes

@iherman iherman iherman approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@gkellogg @ajs6f @iherman