Skip to content

Define v2 context #904

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
OR13 opened this issue Aug 10, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Define v2 context #904

OR13 opened this issue Aug 10, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Aug 10, 2022

What should be in it?

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Aug 10, 2022

I think the v2 context should look like this to start:

{
  "@context": {
    "@version": 1.1,
    "@protected": true,

    "id": "@id",
    "type": "@type",
    "@vocab": "https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials#"
  }
}

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Aug 10, 2022

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2022-08-10

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

4.4. Define v2 context (issue vc-data-model#755)

See github issue vc-data-model#755.

Manu Sporny: +1 to keeping it open, it's relevant..

Kristina Yasuda: I think the previous WG didn't do this because it was a normative change.

Orie Steele: We definitely need to start a new version of the context file, so we can make changes to it..
… In favor of getting us capable of making changes to the context asap..

Kristina Yasuda: Is this the right issue to do that?.

Michael Prorock: +1 to new context file.

Orie Steele: I'm requesting we have a v2 context file. This issue asks the question if we have permission to do that..

Dave Longley: +1 to close the issue, we can now define a v2 context in this WG.

Ivan Herman: +1 to Manu, a v2 context will come up anyway.

Manu Sporny: Short answer is yes we can create a v2 context. We should close the issue since it's misleading what it's asking for. v2 context will happen naturally. If we need an issue for that, we should open a new issue dedicated to this..

See github issue vc-data-model#904.

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Aug 14, 2022

Raised PR #905 to address this issue.

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Aug 24, 2022

PR #905 has been merged, there is now a base v2 context. Closing.

@msporny msporny closed this as completed Aug 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants