Add issue to zkp section

[OR13]

---

Preview | Diff

[Sakurann]

I thought we agreed to replace the section with a concrete shorter text that I think @brentzundel is working on.

[OR13]

@Sakurann

You are corrrect, but....

I have yet to see a PR, and I think this issue can be merged before or after @brentzundel updates the section.

I still feel strongly that it is misleading to claim that W3C Verifiable Credentials support ZKPs when nothing standards track exists, and there are no normative requirements associated with ZKPs.

[brentzundel]

I am working on a PR, but agree that this PR can be merged at any time independent of the one I'm working on.

there are no normative requirements associated with ZKPs.

The v1.1 spec has normative requirements for using VCs with ZKPs, which is why we can't just delete the section (please note, I am not saying they are 'good' or 'testable' normative requirements). I am planning to address them as part of my PR.

[iherman]

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-02-08

• no resolutions were taken

View the transcript

3.1. Add issue to zkp section (pr vc-data-model#1026)

See github pull request vc-data-model#1026.

Manu Sporny: might remove zkp section.
… also have new P.R that changes the zkp section.
… need to decide how we are going to proces these.
… thoughts?.

Brent Zundel: #1030 incorporates and slightly changes the wording of #1026.

[msporny]

Editorial, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, decision to merge this before PR #1030 was approved on the last call, merging.