-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
Add privacy considerations related to legal processes and coercion #1504
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The phrasing "such that a [=holder=] can push back on the over-collection of information that is unnecessary for the transaction." I presume means the holder can decline to share specific information requested. Is that what this implies? If so, then saying that explicitly would be better.
Yes, that's what was meant, your text is more clear. I'll update the PR to use your text, thanks @longpd ! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The phrasing and changes overall address my initial concerns about addressing law enforcement, coercion, and the unreliability of private browsing.
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Editorial, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging. |
This PR is an attempt to address issue #1502 by adding a few more privacy considerations related to legal processes and coercion.
/cc @zoracon
Preview | Diff