Skip to content

New tool: TABNAV WCAG monitor – TABNAV #562

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

New form submission:

  • Tool name: TABNAV WCAG monitor
  • Vendor / organization: TABNAV
  • submission_ref: 31065940-3e54-11f0-ba24-5910c472f24f
  • submission_date: 2025-05-31T19:19:36.916Z

View the submitted JSON in the "Files changed" tab above.

Merge this PR to add the submission to _data/wai-evaluation-tools-list/submissions.

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 31, 2025

Deploy Preview for wai-evaluation-tools-list ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0f6daaf
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/wai-evaluation-tools-list/deploys/68415d766c792c0008a1c55d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-562--wai-evaluation-tools-list.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@josehilera
Copy link
Collaborator

Reference to other functionalities such as “remediation”, should be removed from the web about the tool.

The content of the field features includes: “link directly to learning resources”. Reference to other functionalities or services such as “learning resources” should be removed from the field “features”.

The content of the field features claims “uncover what scanners miss”. No evidences about it.

The content of the field “type” is "Desktop application", "Online tool". There's no evidence of these types on the tool's website. The tool appears to be a widget.

The field “guideline” includes “WCAG 2.0”.It is not clear whether the user can choose to make an assessment according to WCAG 2.0

The content of the accessibility statement in https://tabnav.com/accessibility-statement is general about the website, it is not specific about the tool. Additionally, if the tool is a desktop application, it should include a statement about the application's accessibility. If it's a widget, it should include the widget's accessibility. Otherwise, the field should be blank.

@josehilera
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes accepted by vendor.

"publish-permission": "on",
"purpose": [
"Automated testing",
"Simulated user experience"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@josehilera "Simulated user experience" needs clarification from the vendor. What features does the tool provide that simulate the user experience of people with disabilities?

"Windows",
"MacOS"
],
"features": "Tabnav Monitor simulates real user interactions to detect accessibility issues. It scans across different screen sizes—both desktop and mobile—and provides detailed WCAG reports. A free package is available to get started.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"features": "Tabnav Monitor simulates real user interactions to detect accessibility issues. It scans across different screen sizes—both desktop and mobile—and provides detailed WCAG reports. A free package is available to get started.",
"features": "Tabnav Monitor simulates real user interactions to detect accessibility issues. It scans across different screen sizes—both desktop and mobile—and provides detailed WCAG reports. A free package is available to get started.",

@josehilera Would you please ask the vendor to provide evidence supporting the following claim: "simulates real user interactions"?

@remibetin remibetin assigned josehilera and unassigned remibetin Jul 16, 2025
@josehilera josehilera removed their assignment Jul 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants