Skip to content

Update karma-sauce-launcher to the latest version 🚀#71

Open
greenkeeper[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
greenkeeper/karma-sauce-launcher-1.2.0
Open

Update karma-sauce-launcher to the latest version 🚀#71
greenkeeper[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
greenkeeper/karma-sauce-launcher-1.2.0

Conversation

@greenkeeper
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Aug 22, 2017

Version 1.2.0 of karma-sauce-launcher just got published.

Dependency karma-sauce-launcher
Current Version 1.1.0
Type devDependency

The version 1.2.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of karma-sauce-launcher.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Release Notes v1.2.0

Features

  • config: add proxy option (bae758a)
  • config: allow SE traffic to be sent via Sauce Connect's Relay (0ac67d4)
  • config: pass parentTunnel to selenium (bae326f)
  • deps: upgrade sauce connect (e792677)
  • launcher: expose commandTimeout, idleTimeout, maxDuration options (3fe1c75), closes #62
Commits

The new version differs by 13 commits.

See the full diff

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 2071d5b on greenkeeper/karma-sauce-launcher-1.2.0 into 8b0e62d on master.

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2018
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 11, 2018

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2018
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 12, 2018

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2018
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Dec 12, 2018

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2020
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 17, 2020

Update to this version instead 🚀

Release Notes for v4.0.0

4.0.0 (2020-03-17)

chore

  • release: force-trigger a semantic release (#189) (64217e4)

BREAKING CHANGES

  • release: Drop support for Node <10.

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2020
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 30, 2020

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2020
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 30, 2020

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2020
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 13, 2020

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 28, 2020

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2020
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 26, 2020


🚨 Reminder! Less than one month left to migrate your repositories over to Snyk before Greenkeeper says goodbye on June 3rd! 💜 🚚💨 💚

Find out how to migrate to Snyk at greenkeeper.io


Update to this version instead 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments