Skip to content

chore: Update example link for previews #204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2025

Conversation

colinmurphy
Copy link
Member

@colinmurphy colinmurphy commented May 20, 2025

Description

Related Issue

Dependant PRs

Type of Change

  • ✅ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactoring (no functional changes)
  • 📄 Example update (no functional changes)
  • 📝 Documentation update
  • 🔍 Performance improvement
  • 🧪 Test update

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • My code follows the project's coding standards
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable)
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable)
  • Any dependent changes have been highlighted, merged or published

@colinmurphy colinmurphy marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 18:44
@colinmurphy colinmurphy requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2025 18:44
@ahuseyn ahuseyn added this pull request to the merge queue May 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit ed91f46 May 21, 2025
6 checks passed
@ahuseyn ahuseyn deleted the chore-update-preview-example-link-readme branch May 21, 2025 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants