Skip to content

Upstream drm #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Upstream drm #9

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kongzizaixian
Copy link

No description provided.

@kongzizaixian
Copy link
Author

ｇｏｏｄ

@kongzizaixian
Copy link
Author

good

@xin3liang xin3liang closed this Aug 24, 2015
xin3liang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2015
@gregkh
tty: fix stall caused by missing memory barrier in drivers/tty/n_tty.c
e81107d 
My colleague ran into a program stall on a x86_64 server, where
n_tty_read() was waiting for data even if there was data in the buffer
in the pty.  kernel stack for the stuck process looks like below.
 #0 [ffff88303d107b58] __schedule at ffffffff815c4b20
 #1 [ffff88303d107bd0] schedule at ffffffff815c513e
 #2 [ffff88303d107bf0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff815c7818
 #3 [ffff88303d107ca0] wait_woken at ffffffff81096bd2
 #4 [ffff88303d107ce0] n_tty_read at ffffffff8136fa23
 #5 [ffff88303d107dd0] tty_read at ffffffff81368013
 #6 [ffff88303d107e20] __vfs_read at ffffffff811a3704
 #7 [ffff88303d107ec0] vfs_read at ffffffff811a3a57
 #8 [ffff88303d107f00] sys_read at ffffffff811a4306
 #9 [ffff88303d107f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath at ffffffff815c86d7

There seems to be two problems causing this issue.

First, in drivers/tty/n_tty.c, __receive_buf() stores the data and
updates ldata->commit_head using smp_store_release() and then checks
the wait queue using waitqueue_active().  However, since there is no
memory barrier, __receive_buf() could return without calling
wake_up_interactive_poll(), and at the same time, n_tty_read() could
start to wait in wait_woken() as in the following chart.

        __receive_buf()                         n_tty_read()
------------------------------------------------------------------------
if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait))
/* Memory operations issued after the
   RELEASE may be completed before the
   RELEASE operation has completed */
                                        add_wait_queue(&tty->read_wait, &wait);
                                        ...
                                        if (!input_available_p(tty, 0)) {
smp_store_release(&ldata->commit_head,
                  ldata->read_head);
                                        ...
                                        timeout = wait_woken(&wait,
                                          TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The second problem is that n_tty_read() also lacks a memory barrier
call and could also cause __receive_buf() to return without calling
wake_up_interactive_poll(), and n_tty_read() to wait in wait_woken()
as in the chart below.

        __receive_buf()                         n_tty_read()
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
                                        /* from add_wait_queue() */
                                        ...
                                        if (!input_available_p(tty, 0)) {
                                        /* Memory operations issued after the
                                           RELEASE may be completed before the
                                           RELEASE operation has completed */
smp_store_release(&ldata->commit_head,
                  ldata->read_head);
if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait))
                                        __add_wait_queue(q, wait);
                                        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock,flags);
                                        /* from add_wait_queue() */
                                        ...
                                        timeout = wait_woken(&wait,
                                          TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are also other places in drivers/tty/n_tty.c which have similar
calls to waitqueue_active(), so instead of adding many memory barrier
calls, this patch simply removes the call to waitqueue_active(),
leaving just wake_up*() behind.

This fixes both problems because, even though the memory access before
or after the spinlocks in both wake_up*() and add_wait_queue() can
sneak into the critical section, it cannot go past it and the critical
section assures that they will be serialized (please see "INTER-CPU
ACQUIRING BARRIER EFFECTS" in Documentation/memory-barriers.txt for a
better explanation).  Moreover, the resulting code is much simpler.

Latency measurement using a ping-pong test over a pty doesn't show any
visible performance drop.

Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
xin3liang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@davem330
sh_eth: fix kernel oops in skb_put()
248be83 
In a low memory situation the following kernel oops occurs:

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000050
pgd = 8490c000
[00000050] *pgd=4651e831, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] PREEMPT ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0    Not tainted  (3.4-at16 #9)
PC is at skb_put+0x10/0x98
LR is at sh_eth_poll+0x2c8/0xa10
pc : [<8035f780>]    lr : [<8028bf50>]    psr: 60000113
sp : 84eb1a90  ip : 84eb1ac8  fp : 84eb1ac4
r10: 0000003f  r9 : 000005ea  r8 : 00000000
r7 : 00000000  r6 : 940453b0  r5 : 0003000  r4 : 9381b180
r3 : 00000000  r2 : 00000000  r1 : 000005ea  r0 : 00000000
Flags: nZCv  IRQs on  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment user
Control: 10c53c7d  Table: 4248c059  DAC: 00000015
Process klogd (pid: 2046, stack limit = 0x84eb02e8)
[...]

This is  because netdev_alloc_skb() fails and 'mdp->rx_skbuff[entry]' is left
NULL but sh_eth_rx() later  uses it without checking.  Add such check...

Reported-by: Yasushi SHOJI <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
xin3liang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@gregkh
tty: fix stall caused by missing memory barrier in drivers/tty/n_tty.c
614ea4e 
commit e81107d upstream.

My colleague ran into a program stall on a x86_64 server, where
n_tty_read() was waiting for data even if there was data in the buffer
in the pty.  kernel stack for the stuck process looks like below.
 #0 [ffff88303d107b58] __schedule at ffffffff815c4b20
 #1 [ffff88303d107bd0] schedule at ffffffff815c513e
 #2 [ffff88303d107bf0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff815c7818
 #3 [ffff88303d107ca0] wait_woken at ffffffff81096bd2
 #4 [ffff88303d107ce0] n_tty_read at ffffffff8136fa23
 #5 [ffff88303d107dd0] tty_read at ffffffff81368013
 #6 [ffff88303d107e20] __vfs_read at ffffffff811a3704
 #7 [ffff88303d107ec0] vfs_read at ffffffff811a3a57
 #8 [ffff88303d107f00] sys_read at ffffffff811a4306
 #9 [ffff88303d107f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath at ffffffff815c86d7

There seems to be two problems causing this issue.

First, in drivers/tty/n_tty.c, __receive_buf() stores the data and
updates ldata->commit_head using smp_store_release() and then checks
the wait queue using waitqueue_active().  However, since there is no
memory barrier, __receive_buf() could return without calling
wake_up_interactive_poll(), and at the same time, n_tty_read() could
start to wait in wait_woken() as in the following chart.

        __receive_buf()                         n_tty_read()
------------------------------------------------------------------------
if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait))
/* Memory operations issued after the
   RELEASE may be completed before the
   RELEASE operation has completed */
                                        add_wait_queue(&tty->read_wait, &wait);
                                        ...
                                        if (!input_available_p(tty, 0)) {
smp_store_release(&ldata->commit_head,
                  ldata->read_head);
                                        ...
                                        timeout = wait_woken(&wait,
                                          TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The second problem is that n_tty_read() also lacks a memory barrier
call and could also cause __receive_buf() to return without calling
wake_up_interactive_poll(), and n_tty_read() to wait in wait_woken()
as in the chart below.

        __receive_buf()                         n_tty_read()
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
                                        /* from add_wait_queue() */
                                        ...
                                        if (!input_available_p(tty, 0)) {
                                        /* Memory operations issued after the
                                           RELEASE may be completed before the
                                           RELEASE operation has completed */
smp_store_release(&ldata->commit_head,
                  ldata->read_head);
if (waitqueue_active(&tty->read_wait))
                                        __add_wait_queue(q, wait);
                                        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock,flags);
                                        /* from add_wait_queue() */
                                        ...
                                        timeout = wait_woken(&wait,
                                          TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are also other places in drivers/tty/n_tty.c which have similar
calls to waitqueue_active(), so instead of adding many memory barrier
calls, this patch simply removes the call to waitqueue_active(),
leaving just wake_up*() behind.

This fixes both problems because, even though the memory access before
or after the spinlocks in both wake_up*() and add_wait_queue() can
sneak into the critical section, it cannot go past it and the critical
section assures that they will be serialized (please see "INTER-CPU
ACQUIRING BARRIER EFFECTS" in Documentation/memory-barriers.txt for a
better explanation).  Moreover, the resulting code is much simpler.

Latency measurement using a ping-pong test over a pty doesn't show any
visible performance drop.

Signed-off-by: Kosuke Tatsukawa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
xin3liang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2016
@ahunter6 @acmel
perf tools: tracepoint_error() can receive e=NULL, robustify it
ec183d2 
Fixes segmentation fault using, for instance:

  (gdb) run record -I -e intel_pt/tsc=1,noretcomp=1/u /bin/ls
  Starting program: /home/acme/bin/perf record -I -e intel_pt/tsc=1,noretcomp=1/u /bin/ls
  Missing separate debuginfos, use: dnf debuginfo-install glibc-2.22-7.fc23.x86_64
  [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
  Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".

 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0 x00000000004b9ea5 in tracepoint_error (e=0x0, err=13, sys=0x19b1370 "sched", name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch") at util/parse-events.c:410
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x00000000004b9ea5 in tracepoint_error (e=0x0, err=13, sys=0x19b1370 "sched", name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch") at util/parse-events.c:410
  #1  0x00000000004b9fc5 in add_tracepoint (list=0x19a5d20, idx=0x7fffffffb8c0, sys_name=0x19b1370 "sched", evt_name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch", err=0x0, head_config=0x0)
      at util/parse-events.c:433
  #2  0x00000000004ba334 in add_tracepoint_event (list=0x19a5d20, idx=0x7fffffffb8c0, sys_name=0x19b1370 "sched", evt_name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch", err=0x0, head_config=0x0)
      at util/parse-events.c:498
  #3  0x00000000004bb699 in parse_events_add_tracepoint (list=0x19a5d20, idx=0x7fffffffb8c0, sys=0x19b1370 "sched", event=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch", err=0x0, head_config=0x0)
      at util/parse-events.c:936
  #4  0x00000000004f6eda in parse_events_parse (_data=0x7fffffffb8b0, scanner=0x19a49d0) at util/parse-events.y:391
  #5  0x00000000004bc8e5 in parse_events__scanner (str=0x663ff2 "sched:sched_switch", data=0x7fffffffb8b0, start_token=258) at util/parse-events.c:1361
  #6  0x00000000004bca57 in parse_events (evlist=0x19a5220, str=0x663ff2 "sched:sched_switch", err=0x0) at util/parse-events.c:1401
  #7  0x0000000000518d5f in perf_evlist__can_select_event (evlist=0x19a3b90, str=0x663ff2 "sched:sched_switch") at util/record.c:253
  #8  0x0000000000553c42 in intel_pt_track_switches (evlist=0x19a3b90) at arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c:364
  #9  0x00000000005549d1 in intel_pt_recording_options (itr=0x19a2c40, evlist=0x19a3b90, opts=0x8edf68 <record+232>) at arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c:664
  #10 0x000000000051e076 in auxtrace_record__options (itr=0x19a2c40, evlist=0x19a3b90, opts=0x8edf68 <record+232>) at util/auxtrace.c:539
  #11 0x0000000000433368 in cmd_record (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffde60, prefix=0x0) at builtin-record.c:1264
  #12 0x000000000049bec2 in run_builtin (p=0x8fa2a8 <commands+168>, argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:390
  #13 0x000000000049c12a in handle_internal_command (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:451
  torvalds#14 0x000000000049c278 in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffdcbc, argv=0x7fffffffdcb0) at perf.c:495
  torvalds#15 0x000000000049c60a in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:618
(gdb)

Intel PT attempts to find the sched:sched_switch tracepoint but that seg
faults if tracefs is not readable, because the error reporting structure
is null, as errors are not reported when automatically adding
tracepoints.  Fix by checking before using.

Committer note:

This doesn't take place in a kernel that supports
perf_event_attr.context_switch, that is the default way that will be
used for tracking context switches, only in older kernels, like 4.2, in
a machine with Intel PT (e.g. Broadwell) for non-priviledged users.

Further info from a similar patch by Wang:

The error is in tracepoint_error: it assumes the 'e' parameter is valid.

However, there are many situation a parse_event() can be called without
parse_events_error. See result of

  $ grep 'parse_events(.*NULL)' ./tools/perf/ -r'

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Tong Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # v4.4+
Fixes: 1965817 ("perf tools: Enhance parsing events tracepoint error output")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
xin3liang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2016
@ahunter6 @gregkh
perf tools: tracepoint_error() can receive e=NULL, robustify it
6fa74f5 
commit ec183d2 upstream.

Fixes segmentation fault using, for instance:

  (gdb) run record -I -e intel_pt/tsc=1,noretcomp=1/u /bin/ls
  Starting program: /home/acme/bin/perf record -I -e intel_pt/tsc=1,noretcomp=1/u /bin/ls
  Missing separate debuginfos, use: dnf debuginfo-install glibc-2.22-7.fc23.x86_64
  [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
  Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".

 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0 x00000000004b9ea5 in tracepoint_error (e=0x0, err=13, sys=0x19b1370 "sched", name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch") at util/parse-events.c:410
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x00000000004b9ea5 in tracepoint_error (e=0x0, err=13, sys=0x19b1370 "sched", name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch") at util/parse-events.c:410
  #1  0x00000000004b9fc5 in add_tracepoint (list=0x19a5d20, idx=0x7fffffffb8c0, sys_name=0x19b1370 "sched", evt_name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch", err=0x0, head_config=0x0)
      at util/parse-events.c:433
  #2  0x00000000004ba334 in add_tracepoint_event (list=0x19a5d20, idx=0x7fffffffb8c0, sys_name=0x19b1370 "sched", evt_name=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch", err=0x0, head_config=0x0)
      at util/parse-events.c:498
  #3  0x00000000004bb699 in parse_events_add_tracepoint (list=0x19a5d20, idx=0x7fffffffb8c0, sys=0x19b1370 "sched", event=0x19a5d00 "sched_switch", err=0x0, head_config=0x0)
      at util/parse-events.c:936
  #4  0x00000000004f6eda in parse_events_parse (_data=0x7fffffffb8b0, scanner=0x19a49d0) at util/parse-events.y:391
  #5  0x00000000004bc8e5 in parse_events__scanner (str=0x663ff2 "sched:sched_switch", data=0x7fffffffb8b0, start_token=258) at util/parse-events.c:1361
  #6  0x00000000004bca57 in parse_events (evlist=0x19a5220, str=0x663ff2 "sched:sched_switch", err=0x0) at util/parse-events.c:1401
  #7  0x0000000000518d5f in perf_evlist__can_select_event (evlist=0x19a3b90, str=0x663ff2 "sched:sched_switch") at util/record.c:253
  #8  0x0000000000553c42 in intel_pt_track_switches (evlist=0x19a3b90) at arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c:364
  #9  0x00000000005549d1 in intel_pt_recording_options (itr=0x19a2c40, evlist=0x19a3b90, opts=0x8edf68 <record+232>) at arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c:664
  #10 0x000000000051e076 in auxtrace_record__options (itr=0x19a2c40, evlist=0x19a3b90, opts=0x8edf68 <record+232>) at util/auxtrace.c:539
  #11 0x0000000000433368 in cmd_record (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffde60, prefix=0x0) at builtin-record.c:1264
  #12 0x000000000049bec2 in run_builtin (p=0x8fa2a8 <commands+168>, argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:390
  #13 0x000000000049c12a in handle_internal_command (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:451
  torvalds#14 0x000000000049c278 in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffdcbc, argv=0x7fffffffdcb0) at perf.c:495
  torvalds#15 0x000000000049c60a in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:618
(gdb)

Intel PT attempts to find the sched:sched_switch tracepoint but that seg
faults if tracefs is not readable, because the error reporting structure
is null, as errors are not reported when automatically adding
tracepoints.  Fix by checking before using.

Committer note:

This doesn't take place in a kernel that supports
perf_event_attr.context_switch, that is the default way that will be
used for tracking context switches, only in older kernels, like 4.2, in
a machine with Intel PT (e.g. Broadwell) for non-priviledged users.

Further info from a similar patch by Wang:

The error is in tracepoint_error: it assumes the 'e' parameter is valid.

However, there are many situation a parse_event() can be called without
parse_events_error. See result of

  $ grep 'parse_events(.*NULL)' ./tools/perf/ -r'

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Tong Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Fixes: 1965817 ("perf tools: Enhance parsing events tracepoint error output")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kongzizaixian @xin3liang