fixed #17708 (intl number formatter) #17826
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I removed the hack, so this is now just some extended tests. |
|
Oh my... This should actually be the same as but it is not :( with ICU greater 60 (with intl) it is So something is wrong with NumberFormatter and CC: @samdark |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looks like the intl formatter and framework implementation are off-by one handling digits?!
btw: How is the intl extension disabled in tests.
Addon: Format is also different between both implementation
E5vs.E+5, shouldn't that be fixed also or does this depend on a locale?