-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 366
Use in and or instead of multipleif's
#3266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
d-v-b
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think this is doomed because data is not guaranteed to be hashable
|
Perhaps I can keep the additional |
08ac700 to
a318d58
Compare
|
what about using a tuple instead of a set? |
or instead of multipleifsor instead of multipleif's
|
Of course, you're right. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3266 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 59.56% 59.56%
=======================================
Files 78 78
Lines 8686 8684 -2
=======================================
- Hits 5174 5173 -1
+ Misses 3512 3511 -1
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
a318d58 to
94f45e1
Compare
or instead of multipleif'sin and or instead of multipleif's
TODO:
docs/user-guide/*.rstchanges/