Skip to content

Move metadata handling in a class. #581

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Carreau
Copy link
Contributor

@Carreau Carreau commented Aug 4, 2020

This will make it a tiny bit easier to make a transition to V3 by having
groups/array use an instance to encode/decode instead of refering to the
function/module.

While for v2 it does not make much difference; I'm expecting instances
in V3 to likely be (some of) the pieces that handle extensions, and be
passed around in a hierarchy.

I currently re-expose the methods at the module level to not change the
API/tests, though I expect to wrap them and add deprecation once I've
move the Groups/Arrays/Attributes to use those.

This will make it a tiny bit easier to make a transition to V3 by having
groups/array use an instance to encode/decode instead of refering to the
function/module.

While for v2 it does not make much difference; I'm expecting instances
in V3 to likely be (some of) the pieces that handle extensions, and be
passed around in a hierarchy.

I currently re-expose the methods at the module level to not change the
API/tests, though I expect to wrap them and add deprecation once I've
move the Groups/Arrays/Attributes to use those.
@Carreau Carreau marked this pull request as draft September 14, 2020 18:50
@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

Handled in #839.

@joshmoore joshmoore closed this May 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants