Skip to content

Conversation

stefannica
Copy link
Contributor

@stefannica stefannica commented Apr 4, 2025

Describe changes

Reuse the existing step logger context and the pipeline run logs reference to collect the client-side stdout and stderr output of a pipeline run and store it in the active artifact store, so it can be fetched and displayed in the pipeline run logs tab in the dashboard.

Pre-requisites

Please ensure you have done the following:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have based my new branch on develop and the open PR is targeting develop. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop.
  • IMPORTANT: I made sure that my changes are reflected properly in the following resources:
    • ZenML Docs
    • Dashboard: Needs to be communicated to the frontend team.
    • Templates: Might need adjustments (that are not reflected in the template tests) in case of non-breaking changes and deprecations.
    • Projects: Depending on the version dependencies, different projects might get affected.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Other (add details above)

@stefannica stefannica requested a review from schustmi April 4, 2025 16:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@stefannica stefannica requested review from bcdurak and htahir1 April 4, 2025 16:34
@github-actions github-actions bot added internal To filter out internal PRs and issues enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 4, 2025
@stefannica stefannica requested a review from schustmi April 14, 2025 14:13
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 14, 2025

ZenML CLI Performance Comparison (Threshold: 1.0s, Timeout: 60s, Slow: 5s)

❌ Failed Commands on Current Branch (feature/pipeline-run-logs)

  • zenml stack list: Command failed on run 1 (exit code: 1)
  • zenml pipeline list: Command failed on run 1 (exit code: 1)
  • zenml model list: Command failed on run 1 (exit code: 1)

🚨 New Failures Introduced

The following commands fail on your branch but worked on the target branch:

  • zenml stack list
  • zenml pipeline list
  • zenml model list

Performance Comparison

Command develop Time (s) feature/pipeline-run-logs Time (s) Difference Status
zenml --help 1.560274 ± 0.011045 1.558087 ± 0.007874 -0.002s ✓ No significant change
zenml model list Not tested Failed N/A ❌ Broken in current branch
zenml pipeline list Not tested Failed N/A ❌ Broken in current branch
zenml stack --help 1.566137 ± 0.009055 1.568054 ± 0.011000 +0.002s ✓ No significant change
zenml stack list Not tested Failed N/A ❌ Broken in current branch

Summary

  • Total commands analyzed: 5
  • Commands compared for timing: 2
  • Commands improved: 0 (0.0% of compared)
  • Commands degraded: 0 (0.0% of compared)
  • Commands unchanged: 2 (100.0% of compared)
  • Failed commands: 3 (NEW FAILURES INTRODUCED)
  • Timed out commands: 0
  • Slow commands: 0

Environment Info

  • Target branch: Linux 6.8.0-1021-azure
  • Current branch: Linux 6.8.0-1021-azure
  • Test timestamp: 2025-04-14T15:33:43Z
  • Timeout: 60 seconds
  • Slow threshold: 5 seconds

@@ -243,6 +249,10 @@ class PipelineRunResponseMetadata(ProjectScopedResponseMetadata):
title="Substitutions used in the step runs of this pipeline run.",
default_factory=dict,
)
logs: Optional["LogsResponse"] = Field(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that we're newly introducing this, I think PipelineRunResponseResources would be the appropriate container for this attribute, as this refers to another response model?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Comment on lines 828 to 833
compiled_deployment, schedule, build = self._compile(
**self._run_args
)
self._run_args["deployment"] = compiled_deployment
self._run_args["schedule"] = schedule
self._run_args["build"] = build
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is super ugly 😅 I'm guessing this was necessary to figure out the final state of enable_pipeline_logs before calling the rest of the code?

I'm wondering if there's a cleaner way to achieve this? I guess the value is just:

logging_enabled = run_config.enable_pipeline_logs
if logging_enabled is None:
  logging_enabled = self.config.enable_pipeline_logs

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not just super-ugly, but apparently also breaking everything.

Your suggestion looks a lot better. Done.

@stefannica stefannica requested a review from schustmi April 14, 2025 15:22
Copy link
Contributor

Images automagically compressed by Calibre's image-actions

Compression reduced images by 24.4%, saving 74.06 KB.

Filename Before After Improvement Visual comparison
docs/book/.gitbook/assets/zenml_pipeline_run_logs.png 303.44 KB 229.38 KB -24.4% View diff

497 images did not require optimisation.

Update required: Update image-actions configuration to the latest version before 1/1/21. See README for instructions.

logging_enabled = False
else:
logging_enabled = self._run_args.get(
"enable_pipeline_logs", True
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's still missing the check of self.config.enable_pipeline_logs as a last fallback?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right, I missed that. Done.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 14, 2025

Documentation Link Check Results

Absolute links check passed
Relative links check passed
Last checked: 2025-04-14 19:19:25 UTC

@stefannica stefannica requested a review from schustmi April 14, 2025 15:34
@stefannica stefannica merged commit 0b96daf into develop Apr 15, 2025
132 of 135 checks passed
@stefannica stefannica deleted the feature/pipeline-run-logs branch April 15, 2025 08:38
strickvl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
Document the new feature from PR #3498 that stores client-side pipeline logs in the artifact store, making them accessible after client session ends. Update configuration options and add benefits section.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
strickvl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
* Add deployment link

* Move Custom Output Names section higher in docs to highlight fundamental concept

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

* Fix images in self-hosted page

* Reorg IaC section and move best practices to 'Learn' tab

* Fix TOC

* Clarify OSS vs Pro features in Model Control Plane documentation

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

* Refine wording in Model Control Plane documentation to enhance clarity regarding open-source and Pro features

* Fix GIF URL

* Clarify Workspace URL meaning for Pro users in Terraform docs

Add specific guidance for ZenML Pro users about what the server_url parameter means in their context, making it clear they should use their Workspace URL from the dashboard.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

* Clarify Workspace URL and API key usage in Terraform IaC docs

Add specific information for ZenML Pro users about Workspace URL configuration and improve the API key generation documentation.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

* Update logging docs to include client-side pipeline logs storage

Document the new feature from PR #3498 that stores client-side pipeline logs in the artifact store, making them accessible after client session ends. Update configuration options and add benefits section.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

* Add schedule types column to orchestrator scheduling support table

This commit adds a new column to the orchestrator comparison table in the scheduling documentation that specifies which schedule types (Cron, Interval, One-time) are supported by each orchestrator with scheduling capabilities.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

* Make the distinction between configure and with_options

* Update with a gotcha

* Improve the service connectors docs page

* add images

* Enhance Docker build documentation with details from DockerSettings docstring

- Add details about the Docker build process flow
- Document requirements installation order
- Explain skip_build behavior in detail
- Add notes about custom Dockerfile usage
- Improve details on environment replication options
- Add section on package installer options
- Document build reuse prevention options
- Add section on target repository configuration
- Add section on container user permissions
- Add new best practice about container security

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

* Remove the prevent build reuse stuff

* Remove unused terraform-stack-management.md file

* Fix merge conflict remaining markers

* Add redirect for IaC page

* Add workspace URL image

* Remove bad redirect

* Move the image outside the info box

* Testing

* add a warning hint about logs

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internal To filter out internal PRs and issues run-slow-ci
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants