Skip to content

refactor: Replace MVC by WebFLux in the API Catalog #4192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

pj892031
Copy link
Contributor

@pj892031 pj892031 commented Jul 1, 2025

Description

This PR updates the module to use WebFlux instead of MVC. It is important step to be part of the modulith.

Linked to # (issue)
Part of the # (epic)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • fix: Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • feat: New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • docs: Change in a documentation
  • refactor: Refactor the code
  • chore: Chore, repository cleanup, updates the dependencies.
  • BREAKING CHANGE or !: Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • PR title conforms to commit message guideline ## Commit Message Structure Guideline
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. In JS I did provide JSDoc
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • The java tests in the area I was working on leverage @nested annotations
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

For more details about how should the code look like read the Contributing guideline

@pj892031 pj892031 force-pushed the reboot/catalog-modulith-webflux branch from 43268c6 to bf3e30e Compare July 3, 2025 10:19
pj892031 added 3 commits July 3, 2025 12:22
Signed-off-by: Pavel Jareš <[email protected]>
@pj892031
Copy link
Contributor Author

pj892031 commented Jul 3, 2025

Replaced by #4196 (a rebase issue)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant