Skip to content

Conversation

@mvanwyk
Copy link
Contributor

@mvanwyk mvanwyk commented Mar 15, 2025

Allow users to perform arbitrary Ibis aggregations on specified columns by adding an extra_aggs parameter to SegTransactionStats. This enables functionality like counting distinct stores or products by segment.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added flexible aggregation options, allowing users to specify additional custom aggregations.
    • Updated data output to include results from these extra aggregations.
  • Tests

    • Expanded test coverage to ensure proper validation and handling of the extra aggregation options.

Allow users to perform arbitrary Ibis aggregations on specified columns
by adding an extra_aggs parameter to SegTransactionStats. This enables
functionality like counting distinct stores or products by segment.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
@mvanwyk mvanwyk requested review from Copilot and mayurkmmt March 15, 2025 11:49
@mvanwyk mvanwyk self-assigned this Mar 15, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the SegTransactionStats class by adding an optional extra_aggs parameter to both its constructor and the _calc_seg_stats method. This parameter allows users to specify additional aggregation operations with built-in validation against the input data. The DataFrame property is also modified to include these extra aggregations. Additionally, new tests are added to verify the proper functionality and error handling of the extra_aggs parameter.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
pyretailscience/…/segmentation.py Added extra_aggs parameter to the SegTransactionStats constructor and _calc_seg_stats method with validation for column existence and aggregation function; updated the df property to include extra aggregations.
tests/analysis/test_segmentation.py Introduced new test methods (test_extra_aggs_functionality, test_extra_aggs_with_invalid_column, test_extra_aggs_with_invalid_function) to verify the correct behavior and error handling of extra_aggs.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant S as SegTransactionStats
    participant A as _calc_seg_stats
    participant D as DataFrame

    U->>S: Instantiate with data, segment_col, extra_aggs
    S->>S: Validate extra_aggs (column existence, function validity)
    S->>A: Call _calc_seg_stats(data, segment_col, extra_aggs)
    A->>A: Iterate extra_aggs, apply each aggregation
    A->>S: Return aggregated results
    S->>D: Include extra aggregation columns in DataFrame output
    S->>U: Return complete DataFrame with aggregations
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, Tests, Review effort [1-5]: 3

Suggested reviewers

  • mayurkmmt

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping with glee,
Extra aggs now set our data free.
Columns checked with a twitch of my ear,
Aggregations applied, oh so clear!
With each clean hop, a bug disappears 🐇
Celebrating code with joyful cheers!
Hop on, my friend—onward we steer!

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py 72.78% <100.00%> (+3.77%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces an extra_aggs parameter to SegTransactionStats so users can perform arbitrary Ibis aggregations on specified columns.

  • Updated the SegTransactionStats class to accept and process extra_aggs in both the constructor and the aggregation function.
  • Added tests covering correct functionality as well as error cases for invalid aggregation specifications.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
tests/analysis/test_segmentation.py Adds tests for extra_aggs functionality and error handling.
pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py Modifies init and _calc_seg_stats to support extra_aggs.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py:289

  • The docstring for _calc_seg_stats states that it returns a pd.DataFrame, but it actually returns an ibis.Table. Please update the docstring to accurately reflect the return type.
Returns:

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py (1)

350-353: Consider additional handling for column ordering

The extra aggregation columns are added to the end of the column list. For improved usability, you might want to add a parameter to control the position of these columns in the final DataFrame.

You could enhance column ordering flexibility with something like:

 # Add any extra aggregation columns to the column order
 if hasattr(self, "extra_aggs") and self.extra_aggs:
-    col_order.extend(self.extra_aggs.keys())
+    extra_cols = list(self.extra_aggs.keys())
+    # Optional: sort the extra columns alphabetically for consistent output
+    extra_cols.sort()
+    col_order.extend(extra_cols)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 497eb54 and d126c8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py (6 hunks)
  • tests/analysis/test_segmentation.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/analysis/test_segmentation.py (3)

317-371: Well-structured test for extra_aggs functionality

The test thoroughly verifies both single and multiple aggregation capabilities. It sets clear expected values as constants and includes appropriate assertions for each segment type. The test design effectively validates the core functionality of the new feature.


372-387: Good error case handling for invalid columns

This test correctly verifies that the appropriate error is raised when an invalid column is specified in extra_aggs. The assertion checking for the presence of "does not exist in the data" in the error message ensures the error is descriptive and helpful.


388-402: Good error case handling for invalid functions

The test appropriately checks that an invalid aggregation function triggers the expected ValueError with a descriptive message. This helps ensure robust input validation.

pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py (5)

192-212: Well-documented parameter addition to init method

The extra_aggs parameter is properly typed and well-documented with clear examples. The docstring effectively explains the parameter's purpose, expected format, and usage.


228-238: Comprehensive validation for extra_aggs parameter

The validation logic properly checks both that specified columns exist in the data and that the requested aggregation functions are available for those columns. The error messages are clear and descriptive.


240-242: Proper initialization and method call with extra_aggs

The code correctly initializes extra_aggs as an empty dictionary when None is provided and properly passes it to the _calc_seg_stats method.


274-287: Well-documented _calc_seg_stats method parameter

The method signature is properly updated with the extra_aggs parameter, including appropriate type annotations and documentation. This maintains consistency with the class constructor.


309-314: Efficient implementation of extra aggregations

The code that applies the extra aggregations is concise and follows the same pattern as the base aggregations. It correctly uses the getattr function to dynamically access the aggregation method on the column.

@mvanwyk mvanwyk merged commit c6d8e91 into main Mar 17, 2025
3 checks passed
@mvanwyk mvanwyk deleted the feature/segstats_extra_aggs branch March 17, 2025 06:41
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants