Skip to content

feat: add total row to SegTransactionStats calculation #57

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

mvanwyk
Copy link
Contributor

@mvanwyk mvanwyk commented Jul 5, 2024

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests


Description

  • Added a total row calculation to the segment statistics in SegTransactionStats.
  • Refactored the segment statistics calculation into a new _calc_seg_stats method.
  • Introduced a hide_total parameter in the plot method to optionally hide the total row.
  • Removed validation against TransactionItemLevelContract and TransactionLevelContract.
  • Added comprehensive unit tests for the new _calc_seg_stats method.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
segmentation.py
Add total row and refactor segment statistics calculation

pyretailscience/segmentation.py

  • Added a total row calculation to segment statistics.
  • Refactored the segment statistics calculation into a new
    _calc_seg_stats method.
  • Introduced a hide_total parameter in the plot method to optionally
    hide the total row.
  • Removed validation against TransactionItemLevelContract and
    TransactionLevelContract.
  • +44/-26 
    Tests
    test_segmentation.py
    Add unit tests for segment statistics calculation               

    tests/test_segmentation.py

  • Added tests for the _calc_seg_stats method.
  • Verified correct calculation of revenue, transactions, and customers
    per segment.
  • Ensured the original DataFrame remains unaltered.
  • Tested handling of DataFrame with only one segment.
  • Checked for errors when DataFrame is missing required columns.
  • +101/-0 

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    • New Features

      • Added hide_total parameter to control the visibility of the total row in plots.
      • Enhanced segment statistics calculations, including new metrics like revenue and transactions.
    • Bug Fixes

      • Improved validation and error handling in segmentation initialization.
    • Tests

      • Introduced test cases to validate revenue, transactions, and customer calculations per segment, ensuring proper handling of various DataFrame scenarios.

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Jul 5, 2024

    Walkthrough

    The segmentation.py module in pyretailscience has seen substantial updates, including enhanced validation logic using CustomContract, a refactored method _calc_seg_stats for calculating various segment statistics, and an updated plot method with a new hide_total parameter. Testing for these enhancements has been added in tests/test_segmentation.py.

    Changes

    File Path Change Summary
    pyretailscience/segmentation.py Significant updates including refactored _calc_seg_stats, enhanced __init__ validation, and new hide_total parameter in plot.
    tests/test_segmentation.py Added new file with test cases for validating segment statistics calculations and error handling in pyretailscience.segmentation.

    Poem

    In the code's enchanted warren,
    Segments dance without a bar,
    Stats arise, with logic's paren,
    From hutch to code, we've come so far.
    With plots anew and errors clear,
    Our module sings—give it a cheer! 🎉🐇


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share
    Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
      • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

    CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jul 5, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Possible Bug:
    The removal of TransactionItemLevelContract and TransactionLevelContract validations and their replacement with a custom contract might introduce issues if the custom contract does not cover all the scenarios previously handled. Ensure that the new contract validations are comprehensive.

    Data Integrity:
    The method _calc_seg_stats adds a total row directly to the DataFrame. This could lead to unexpected behavior or errors in downstream processes that do not expect a 'total' row. Consider returning the total calculations separately or ensuring that all consuming methods handle this appropriately.

    @mvanwyk
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    mvanwyk commented Jul 5, 2024

    /describe
    --pr_description.extra_instructions="
    For the title, use the format [type]: [summary]
    "
    --pr_description.publish_labels=true
    --pr_description.publish_description_as_comment=true
    --pr_description.generate_ai_title=true

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jul 5, 2024

    Title

    Enhancement: Add total row calculation and refactor segment statistics


    PR Type

    Enhancement, Tests


    Description

    • Added a total row calculation to the segment statistics in SegTransactionStats.
    • Refactored the segment statistics calculation into a new _calc_seg_stats method.
    • Introduced a hide_total parameter in the plot method to optionally hide the total row.
    • Removed the dependency on TransactionItemLevelContract and TransactionLevelContract.
    • Added comprehensive unit tests for the new _calc_seg_stats method and SegTransactionStats class.

    Changes walkthrough 📝

    Relevant files
    Enhancement
    segmentation.py
    Add total row calculation and refactor segment statistics method

    pyretailscience/segmentation.py

  • Added a total row calculation to segment statistics.
  • Refactored the method to calculate segment statistics.
  • Introduced a new parameter hide_total in the plot method.
  • Removed dependency on TransactionItemLevelContract and
    TransactionLevelContract.
  • +44/-26 
    Tests
    test_segmentation.py
    Add unit tests for SegTransactionStats and _calc_seg_stats

    tests/test_segmentation.py

  • Added tests for the _calc_seg_stats method.
  • Added tests for the SegTransactionStats class.
  • Verified calculations and ensured original DataFrame is unaltered.
  • +101/-0 

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link
    Contributor

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jul 5, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    ✅ Include the "quantity" column in the required columns list if it exists in the DataFrame
    Suggestion Impact:The suggestion was implemented by adding a check for the "quantity" column in the DataFrame and appending it to the required columns list if it exists.

    code diff:

    +        if "quantity" in df.columns:
    +            required_cols.append("quantity")

    The required_cols list should include the "quantity" column if it exists in the DataFrame
    to ensure consistency in validation.

    pyretailscience/segmentation.py [147]

     required_cols = ["customer_id", "total_price", "transaction_id", segment_col]
    +if "quantity" in df.columns:
    +    required_cols.append("quantity")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion is crucial for ensuring data consistency and validation completeness, especially since "quantity" is used later in the calculations.

    8
    Ensure the segment_col exists in the DataFrame before proceeding with calculations

    Add a check to ensure that the segment_col exists in the DataFrame before proceeding with
    calculations to avoid potential errors.

    pyretailscience/segmentation.py [160]

    +if segment_col not in df.columns:
    +    raise ValueError(f"The segment column '{segment_col}' does not exist in the DataFrame")
     self.df = self._calc_seg_stats(df, segment_col)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion is critical to avoid runtime errors when the specified segment column does not exist in the DataFrame, which can lead to misleading or incorrect analysis results.

    8
    Ensure the DataFrame is not empty before proceeding with calculations

    Add a check to ensure that the DataFrame is not empty before proceeding with calculations
    to avoid potential errors.

    pyretailscience/segmentation.py [154-156]

    -if contract.validate() is False:
    -    msg = f"The dataframe requires the columns {required_cols} and they must be non-null"
    +if contract.validate() is False or df.empty:
    +    msg = f"The dataframe requires the columns {required_cols}, they must be non-null, and the dataframe must not be empty"
         raise ValueError(msg)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion is important to prevent runtime errors from operations on an empty DataFrame, which is a common source of bugs in data processing.

    7
    Enhancement
    Use the agg method directly with a dictionary for better readability and maintainability

    Use agg method directly with a dictionary instead of unpacking it to improve readability
    and maintainability.

    pyretailscience/segmentation.py [178-182]

     stats_df = pd.concat(
         [
    -        df.groupby(segment_col).agg(**aggs),
    +        df.groupby(segment_col).agg(aggs),
             pd.DataFrame(total_aggs, index=["total"]),
         ],
     )
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion improves readability but does not significantly impact functionality as the existing code is already correct.

    5

    Copy link

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 0

    Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL

    Commits

    Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a0d672 and 030e7ed.

    Files selected for processing (2)
    • pyretailscience/segmentation.py (5 hunks)
    • tests/test_segmentation.py (1 hunks)
    Additional comments not posted (10)
    tests/test_segmentation.py (6)

    12-23: LGTM!

    The base_df fixture is well-defined and provides a comprehensive DataFrame for testing.


    25-40: LGTM!

    The test comprehensively checks multiple metrics calculated by the _calc_seg_stats method and includes a 'total' row in the expected output.


    42-63: LGTM!

    The test ensures the _calc_seg_stats method works correctly without the 'quantity' column.


    65-70: LGTM!

    The test ensures the _calc_seg_stats method does not alter the original DataFrame.


    72-90: LGTM!

    The test ensures the _calc_seg_stats method works correctly with a single-segment DataFrame and includes a 'total' row in the expected output.


    96-101: LGTM!

    The test ensures proper error handling when the DataFrame is missing a required column.

    pyretailscience/segmentation.py (4)

    Line range hint 35-50:
    LGTM!

    The ExistingSegmentation class is well-defined and the validation logic ensures the required columns are present and non-null.


    Line range hint 53-98:
    LGTM!

    The HMLSegmentation class is well-defined and the segmentation logic is clear and concise.


    145-189: LGTM!

    The SegTransactionStats class is well-defined and the refactored _calc_seg_stats method provides detailed segment statistics. The plot method update allows for more flexibility in plotting.


    Line range hint 191-243:
    LGTM!

    The plot method update provides more flexibility in plotting and is well-defined.

    Co-authored-by: codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] <151058649+codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
    Comment on lines +178 to +182
    total_aggs["total_quantity"] = [df["quantity"].sum()]

    stats_df = pd.concat(
    [
    df.groupby(segment_col).agg(**aggs),
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Suggestion: Use the agg method directly with a dictionary for better readability and maintainability [Enhancement, importance: 5]

    Suggested change
    total_aggs["total_quantity"] = [df["quantity"].sum()]
    stats_df = pd.concat(
    [
    df.groupby(segment_col).agg(**aggs),
    stats_df = pd.concat(
    [
    df.groupby(segment_col).agg(aggs),
    pd.DataFrame(total_aggs, index=["total"]),
    ],
    )

    Copy link

    @coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Actionable comments posted: 0

    Review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL

    Commits

    Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 030e7ed and 6dd0289.

    Files selected for processing (1)
    • pyretailscience/segmentation.py (5 hunks)
    Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
    • pyretailscience/segmentation.py

    @mvanwyk mvanwyk merged commit d8c9965 into main Jul 5, 2024
    1 check passed
    @mvanwyk mvanwyk deleted the add_total_row_seg_stats branch July 5, 2024 07:28
    This was referenced Mar 25, 2025
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant