-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
[Look-Ahead §5] scenario-forecast long-horizon-mode + forward-indicators multi-horizon decay #1593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 7 commits
df180fe
66948d7
5c6fc3c
6df6f00
9b63272
d806763
bd6c381
f1acdf9
7eb8442
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -11,6 +11,49 @@ | |
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## 🕐 Multi-Horizon Decay Table | ||
|
|
||
| **Canonical decay numbers live in [`forward-projection-methodology.md §3`](../methodologies/forward-projection-methodology.md#3-wep-decay-table).** The table below shows *which indicator types remain predictively useful at each horizon* — it does NOT replicate WEP probability values. Always read `forward-projection-methodology.md §3` as the authoritative source for the numbers themselves. | ||
|
|
||
| Each indicator is tagged with the horizons at which it retains meaningful predictive signal (`✅ active`) vs. the horizons where it has decayed beyond utility (`⬜ decayed`). | ||
|
|
||
| ```markdown | ||
| ## Multi-Horizon Decay Table | ||
|
|
||
| > WEP decay values are sourced from: [forward-projection-methodology.md §3](../methodologies/forward-projection-methodology.md#3-wep-decay-table). | ||
| > Do NOT duplicate or override those numbers here. | ||
|
|
||
| | Indicator Type | Example | T+7d | T+30d | T+90d | T+12m | T+term-end | T+EP-election | | ||
| |---|---|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | ||
| | **Procedural / calendar** | Committee vote date, rapporteur deadline, trilogue round | ✅ | ✅ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | | ||
| | **Coalition cohesion** | EPP/S&D alignment rate on roll-call votes | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | | ||
| | **Legislative pipeline** | Procedure stage, report adoption, trilogue conclusion | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | | ||
| | **Policy-position shift** | MEP speech-content pivot, amendment filing pattern | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | | ||
| | **National-government change** | Election results, coalition formation in MS | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
| | **Macro-economic signal** | IMF WEO growth revision, fiscal-deficit threshold | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
| | **EP-group composition drift** | Defection rate, new-member absorption pace | ⬜ | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
| | **Presidential/Commission cycle** | Commission WP priorities, DG-level reshuffles | ⬜ | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
| | **Electoral/polling signal** | Eurobarometer party-preference trend, national polling | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
| | **Spitzenkandidaten declared** | Lead-candidate announcement, party-congress endorsement | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
| | **Seat-projection model** | EP seat arithmetic based on national polls | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
| | **Treaty-revision / IGC signal** | IGC announcement, Art. 48 TEU trigger | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ⬜ | ✅ | ✅ | | ||
|
|
||
| **Legend:** ✅ active (indicator retains predictive signal) | ⬜ decayed (signal below useful threshold at this horizon) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Per-indicator horizon tagging | ||
|
|
||
| When populating Section 3 (Indicator Detail Cards), **tag every indicator** with its active horizons using the `**Horizons:**` field (see card template in §3). This allows monitoring plans to silently retire indicators at their decay horizon rather than reporting stale signals. | ||
|
|
||
| **Horizon tag examples:** | ||
| - `rapporteur-deadline` → horizons: `7d / 30d` | ||
| - `EPP-S&D alignment rate` → horizons: `7d / 30d / 90d` | ||
| - `Spitzenkandidaten declared candidates` → horizons: `12m / term-end / EP-election` | ||
| - `Eurobarometer party-preference trend` → horizons: `12m / term-end / EP-election` | ||
| - `National-government election result` → horizons: `30d / 90d / 12m / term-end / EP-election` | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## 📋 Header Block | ||
|
|
||
| ```markdown | ||
|
|
@@ -42,7 +85,7 @@ | |
|
|
||
| ## 📊 Section 2 — Indicator Master Table | ||
|
|
||
| **Required:** ≥10 indicators with all 7 structure fields. | ||
| **Required:** ≥10 indicators with all 8 structure fields. | ||
|
|
||
| ```markdown | ||
| ## Indicator Inventory | ||
|
|
@@ -72,6 +115,9 @@ | |
|
|
||
| **Category:** Political | Institutional | Policy | Electoral | External | Crisis | ||
|
|
||
| **Horizons:** {comma-separated list from: 7d / 30d / 90d / 12m / term-end / EP-election} | ||
| *(See Multi-Horizon Decay Table above for decay rules; canonical WEP bands per horizon in [forward-projection-methodology.md §3](../methodologies/forward-projection-methodology.md#3-wep-decay-table))* | ||
|
|
||
| **Description:** {What this indicator measures and why it matters} | ||
|
|
||
| **Current State:** | ||
|
|
@@ -243,15 +289,24 @@ graph TB | |
| ## ✅ Quality Checklist | ||
|
|
||
| - [ ] ≥10 indicators defined | ||
| - [ ] Each indicator has all 7 structure fields | ||
| - [ ] Each indicator has all 8 structure fields (including required `**Horizons:**` tag) | ||
| - [ ] Multi-Horizon Decay Table present in §Multi-Horizon Decay Table | ||
|
Comment on lines
+292
to
+293
|
||
| - [ ] Every indicator has the `**Horizons:**` field populated with its active horizons (7d / 30d / 90d / 12m / term-end / EP-election) | ||
| - [ ] Indicator categories balanced across Political/Institutional/Policy/Electoral/External/Crisis | ||
| - [ ] Dashboard Mermaid shows all indicators with status | ||
| - [ ] Scenario linkage explicit for each indicator | ||
| - [ ] Alert protocol defined with escalation triggers | ||
| - [ ] EP MCP tool mapping complete | ||
| - [ ] Historical context provided for key indicators | ||
| - [ ] Thresholds evidence-based, not arbitrary | ||
| - [ ] WEP bands referenced from [`forward-projection-methodology.md §3`](../methodologies/forward-projection-methodology.md#3-wep-decay-table) — NOT duplicated here | ||
|
|
||
| ## 🔗 Cross-References | ||
|
|
||
| - [`../methodologies/forward-projection-methodology.md §3`](../methodologies/forward-projection-methodology.md#3-wep-decay-table) — **canonical WEP decay table** and horizon lattice (single source of truth) | ||
| - [`scenario-forecast.md §0`](scenario-forecast.md) — long-horizon mode requirements; EP-election branches that this indicator set must support | ||
| - [`../methodologies/electoral-domain-methodology.md §Part 6`](../methodologies/electoral-domain-methodology.md#part-6--forward-indicators-forward-indicatorsmd) — full methodology for this artifact | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| *Template version 1.0 — EU Parliament Monitor Forward Indicators* | ||
| *Template version 1.1 — EU Parliament Monitor Forward Indicators* | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The structuralRequirements note says the long-horizon scenario gate is “activated when electoralOverlay===true or scenarioMaxHorizonMonths>=36”, but the implementation in
scripts/validate-analysis-completeness.jsactivates it whenmanifest.articleTypeis inlongHorizonScenarioGate.articleTypes. Suggest updating this note to reflect the actual activation criteria (manifest articleType), or readers may assume registry fields affect enforcement.