-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
Generate Reservation
CRD
#52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This was a reservation for 2 instances and note the Status section contains all instance details so kinda beefy. |
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neat 👌
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: A-Hilaly, brycahta, vijtrip2 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is really great. I love that you went with Reservation
as the CRD name - although SEO might be a bit tough for documentation, so hopefully we can figure that out. I have some initialisms for you, and some field paths to ignore, but nothing crazy.
// response element if the instance explicily targets a specific Capacity Reservation | ||
// or Capacity Reservation group. | ||
CapacityReservationSpecification *CapacityReservationSpecificationResponse `json:"capacityReservationSpecification,omitempty"` | ||
ClientToken *string `json:"clientToken,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add this to ignored
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is coming from the Describe call, I believe. Please check
Issue #, if available: aws-controllers-k8s/ec2-controller#52 Description of changes: * adds `SRIOV` and `RAM` to initialisms with updated tests By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Issue #, if available: aws-controllers-k8s/ec2-controller#52 Description of changes: * adds `Ramdisk` to initialisms because the source did not consistently camel case By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
Discussed offline; renaming the resource to |
Stale; re-genning as |
Issue #, if available: aws-controllers-k8s/community#1196
Description of changes:
Reservation
resource backed byRunInstances
,DescribeInstances
, andTerminateInstances
apisBy submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.