Skip to content

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Oct 5, 2024

PR Classification

Framework update to support new .NET version and remove deprecated version.

PR Summary

Updated the project to support .NET 9.0 and removed .NET 6.0 support.

  • pipelines.yml: Added .NET 9.0 to the framework matrix and removed .NET 6.0,
  • Directory.Build.props: Changed target frameworks to net9.0;net8.0 and updated Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App package reference to 9.0.0-preview.8,
  • Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.csproj: Updated Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication package reference to 9.0.0-preview.10,
  • Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Tests.csproj: Updated Cuemon.Security.Cryptography package reference to 9.0.0-preview.10.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated support for .NET 9.0 alongside .NET 8.0 in the CI/CD pipeline and package releases.
    • Introduced version 9.0.0 for the Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4 package.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to package dependencies by updating to the latest versions.
  • Documentation

    • Updated package release notes to reflect new version availability and changes in supported frameworks.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Oct 5, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gimlichael has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0f2a33b and f0b2366.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request include updates to the CI/CD pipeline configuration, the introduction of a new package version, and modifications to project files to support .NET 9.0. The .github/workflows/pipelines.yml file has been modified to update the framework version and enhance the deployment job. Additionally, the package release notes for Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4 have been updated to reflect the removal of .NET 6 support and the introduction of version 9.0.0. Project files have also been updated to target .NET 9.0 and to reference newer package versions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml Updated framework version from [net8.0, net6.0] to [net9.0, net8.0]. Modified deploy job conditions.
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/PackageReleaseNotes.txt Introduced version 9.0.0, supporting .NET 9 and .NET 8, removing .NET 6 support.
Directory.Build.props Updated TargetFrameworks from net8.0;net6.0 to net9.0;net8.0. Updated package reference version.
src/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.csproj Updated Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication package version from 8.3.2 to 9.0.0-preview.10.
test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Tests.csproj Updated Cuemon.Security.Cryptography package version from 8.3.2 to 9.0.0-preview.10.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant CI/CD Pipeline
    participant Build Job
    participant Deploy Job
    participant Code Repository

    CI/CD Pipeline->>Code Repository: Checkout code
    CI/CD Pipeline->>Build Job: Build project
    Build Job->>CI/CD Pipeline: Build success
    CI/CD Pipeline->>Deploy Job: Deploy application
    Deploy Job->>CI/CD Pipeline: Deployment success
Loading

"In the meadow, changes bloom,
Frameworks rise, dispelling gloom.
From six to nine, we leap and bound,
In code and tests, new joys are found.
Hooray for updates, let’s all cheer,
A brighter future, drawing near! 🐇✨"


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (c856350) to head (0f2a33b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #3   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            3         3           
  Lines           86        86           
  Branches         2         2           
=========================================
  Hits            86        86           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)

5-5: Consider simplifying the phrasing (optional)

The static analysis tool suggests that "with respect to" might be wordy. While this is a valid style suggestion, the current phrasing is clear and consistent with previous versions. If brevity is a priority, you could consider alternatives like "for" or "regarding". However, maintaining consistency with previous entries is also valuable.

Example of a more concise alternative:

- CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs
+ CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest for TFMs
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs

  • REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c856350 and 0f2a33b.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
  • .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Build.props (3 hunks)
  • src/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.csproj (1 hunks)
  • test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml

[warning] 29-29: too few spaces after comma

(commas)

🪛 LanguageTool
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/PackageReleaseNotes.txt

[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs

  • REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)

🔇 Additional comments (8)
test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Tests.csproj (1)

8-8: Verify compatibility with the updated package version.

The Cuemon.Security.Cryptography package has been updated from version 8.3.2 to 9.0.0-preview.10. This change aligns with the PR objective to support .NET 9.0. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. This is a preview version, which may introduce breaking changes or unstable features.
  2. Ensure that all tests pass with this new version before merging.
  3. Check if other projects in the solution are using the same package and consider updating them for consistency.

To verify the consistency across the solution and identify potential issues, please run the following script:

This script will help identify any inconsistencies in package versions across the solution.

✅ Verification successful

Cuemon.Security.Cryptography package update is consistent across the solution.

The Cuemon.Security.Cryptography package has been updated to version 9.0.0-preview.10 in both test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Test/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.Tests.csproj and src/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.csproj. No other projects reference older versions of this package, ensuring consistency throughout the solution.

Next Steps:

  • Ensure all tests pass with the new package version to confirm stability and compatibility.
  • Monitor for any potential issues introduced by using a preview version before merging.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Cuemon.Security.Cryptography usage across the solution

# Test 1: Check for other occurrences of Cuemon.Security.Cryptography
echo "Checking for other occurrences of Cuemon.Security.Cryptography:"
rg --type xml 'Include="Cuemon.Security.Cryptography"' -g '*.csproj'

# Test 2: Check for any Cuemon packages that might need updating
echo "Checking for any Cuemon packages that might need updating:"
rg --type xml 'Include="Cuemon.' -g '*.csproj'

# Test 3: Check for any packages still referencing version 8.x
echo "Checking for any packages still referencing version 8.x:"
rg --type xml 'Version="8\.' -g '*.csproj'

Length of output: 1092

src/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4.csproj (1)

13-13: Approved: Package version update aligns with PR objectives.

The update of Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication to version 9.0.0-preview.10 is in line with the PR's goal of supporting .NET 9.0. However, please consider the following points:

  1. This is a major version upgrade (9.x from 8.x), which may introduce breaking changes. Review the package's release notes for any such changes and update your code accordingly.
  2. The new version is a preview release. While this is appropriate for testing .NET 9.0 support, be aware that it may introduce instability. Ensure thorough testing before deploying to production.
  3. Verify that this upgrade doesn't conflict with other dependencies in your project.
  4. Consider adding a comment explaining the use of a preview version, to prevent accidental updates to a stable version before the project is ready.

To ensure all related packages are updated consistently, run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: All references to Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication version 8.x have been successfully updated to 9.x.

No further action is required regarding the package version update.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to Cuemon packages with version 8.x

# Test: Search for Cuemon package references. Expect: Only version 9.x references.
rg --type csproj 'Include="Cuemon' -A 1

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to Cuemon packages with version 8.x
# Test: Search for Cuemon package references in .csproj files. Expect: Only version 9.x references.
rg 'Include="Cuemon.AspNetCore.Authentication" Version="8\.' --glob '*.csproj' -A 1

Length of output: 85

.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AwsSignature4/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)

1-7: Consistent formatting and structure maintained

The new entry for version 9.0.0 maintains consistency with the established format and content structure of previous versions. This consistency is commendable as it:

  1. Aids in readability
  2. Helps users quickly understand the changes in each version
  3. Maintains a professional and organized appearance of the release notes
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs

  • REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)


1-6: Version 9.0.0 update: Major changes in framework support

The release notes for version 9.0.0 accurately reflect the significant changes made in this update:

  1. Addition of .NET 9 support
  2. Retention of .NET 8 support
  3. Removal of .NET 6 (LTS) support

These changes align with the PR objectives and represent a major version increment. The removal of .NET 6 support is a breaking change that should be prominently communicated to users.

To ensure consistency with the project file changes, please run the following script:

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs

  • REMOVED Support for TFM .NET 6...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)

Directory.Build.props (4)

Line range hint 1-84: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives, but require careful testing

The changes in this file successfully update the project to target .NET 9.0 and remove .NET 6.0 support, aligning with the PR objectives. However, there are a few important points to consider:

  1. Ensure all project code and dependencies are compatible with .NET 9.0.
  2. Verify that all tests run correctly on the new framework versions.
  3. Be cautious with the use of the preview version of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App and plan for updating to a stable version when available.

These changes represent a significant update to the project's target frameworks. Thorough testing across all affected components is crucial to ensure stability and compatibility.


18-18: LGTM! Verify compatibility with .NET 9.0

The update to target frameworks (net9.0;net8.0) aligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 9.0 and removing .NET 6.0. This change is appropriate and forward-looking.

Please ensure all project dependencies and code are compatible with .NET 9.0. You may want to run the following command to check for any compatibility issues:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with .NET 9.0

# Test: Search for usage of APIs or features that might not be compatible with .NET 9.0
rg --type csharp -i "obsolete|deprecated|removed in|not supported in"

80-80: Approved, but consider the implications of using a preview package

The update to Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App version 9.0.0-preview.8 is likely necessary for .NET 9.0 compatibility. However, using a preview version may introduce potential instability or breaking changes.

Please ensure that:

  1. This preview version is stable enough for your project's needs.
  2. You have a plan to update to the stable version when it becomes available.
  3. You've tested the project thoroughly with this preview version.

Run the following command to check for any breaking changes or deprecations in the new version:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes or deprecations in Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App

# Test: Search for usage of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App APIs that might have changed
rg --type csharp "Codebelt\.Extensions\.Xunit\.App"

52-52: LGTM! Ensure test compatibility with .NET 9.0

The update to target frameworks (net9.0;net8.0) for test projects is consistent with the main project update and aligns with the PR objectives.

Please verify that all test dependencies and frameworks (e.g., xunit) are compatible with .NET 9.0. Run the tests to ensure they execute correctly on the new framework. You can use the following command to check for any potential issues in test files:

matrix:
configuration: [Debug, Release]
framework: [net8.0,net6.0]
framework: [net9.0,net8.0]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Update Needed for Remaining .NET 6.0 Reference

The testenvironments.json file still references .NET 6.0, which conflicts with the framework update to support .NET 9.0 and remove .NET 6.0. Please update or remove the .NET 6.0 reference to ensure consistency across the workflow.

  • File: testenvironments.json
    • Line: Contains net6.0 in the dockerImage configuration.
🔗 Analysis chain

Approve framework update with minor formatting suggestion

The update to support .NET 9.0 and remove .NET 6.0 is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. However, there's a minor formatting issue that should be addressed.

Please add a space after the comma for better readability:

-        framework: [net9.0,net8.0]
+        framework: [net9.0, net8.0]

Additionally, please verify if any other parts of the workflow need updating to fully support .NET 9.0. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to .NET 6.0 or potential areas that might need adjustment for .NET 9.0:

This will help ensure that the entire workflow is consistent with the new .NET 9.0 support.


🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for .NET version references and potential areas needing adjustment

# Test: Search for .NET version references
echo "Checking for .NET version references:"
rg --type yaml '(net[678]\.0|netcoreapp3\.1)'

# Test: Search for potential areas that might need adjustment for .NET 9.0
echo "Checking for potential areas needing adjustment for .NET 9.0:"
rg --type yaml '(dotnet|framework|runtime|sdk)'

Length of output: 613


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-run .NET version references search without type filtering and include debug information

# Test: Search for .NET version references without type filter
echo "Checking for .NET version references without type filter:"
rg '(net[678]\.0|netcoreapp3\.1)' --debug

# Test: Search for potential areas needing adjustment for .NET 9.0 without type filter
echo "Checking for potential areas needing adjustment for .NET 9.0 without type filter:"
rg '(dotnet|framework|runtime|sdk)' --debug

Length of output: 42641

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[warning] 29-29: too few spaces after comma

(commas)

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 5, 2024

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 287333f into main Oct 5, 2024
5 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.0/net9rc1-support branch October 5, 2024 15:16
This was referenced Nov 11, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant