-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
V3.0.0/rtm #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V3.0.0/rtm #5
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes several corrections to namespace identifiers across multiple documentation files, changing Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Directory.Packages.props (1)
Line range hint
1-32
: Consider adding package version validation in CI/CDSince this is a major version update (v3.0.0) with multiple interdependent packages, consider implementing automated package version validation in your CI/CD pipeline to ensure:
- All related packages maintain version synchronization
- No package downgrades occur accidentally
- Version constraints are properly enforced across different target frameworks
This will help maintain consistency in future updates.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.md
(1 hunks).docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.md
(1 hunks).docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.md
(1 hunks).docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.md
(1 hunks).docfx/includes/availability-default.md
(1 hunks).docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
(1 hunks)Directory.Packages.props
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.md
- .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.md
- .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.md
- .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.md
- .docfx/includes/availability-default.md
- .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Directory.Packages.props (2)
19-23
: LGTM! Consistent version upgrade across Microsoft packages
Good synchronization of all Microsoft packages to stable version 9.0.0. This ensures compatibility between the core ASP.NET components.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify breaking changes and compatibility between RC2 and stable releases
# Check for any Program.cs or Startup.cs files that might need updates
fd -e cs -x grep -l "IServiceCollection\|IHostBuilder\|AddRazorRuntimeCompilation"
# Look for custom middleware or configuration setup that might be affected
rg "Configure.*Services|Configure.*Pipeline" -g "*.cs"
6-9
: Verify compatibility between Codebelt and Cuemon packages
The transition from RC to stable versions looks good, but we should verify the compatibility between these packages, especially since Cuemon.Core is a fundamental dependency.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Updating to Cuemon v9.0.0 stable appears safe
The transition from RC to stable v9.0.0 has been thoroughly documented with multiple PRs addressing various improvements and migrations. Key observations:
- No breaking changes reported in the changelog
- Performance improvements for .NET 9.0+ through System.Threading.Lock
- Proper dependency management in place with Cuemon.Core referenced correctly in Codebelt.Bootstrapper
- Migration PRs show careful attention to compatibility (Swashbuckle, XUnit, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any compatibility issues or breaking changes in the updated packages
# Check if there are any documented breaking changes between RC and stable
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "gimlichael", name: "Cuemon") {
releases(first: 5, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
nodes {
name
description
tagName
}
}
}
}'
# Search for any dependency requirements in package configurations
rg -g "*.csproj" -g "*.props" "Cuemon.Core" -A 5
Length of output: 6310
This pull request includes several updates to correct namespace identifiers, update availability information, and upgrade package versions. The most important changes are grouped by theme below.
Namespace corrections:
uid
and namespace descriptions forCodebelt.Bootstrapper
and its sub-namespaces in various.docfx
files to fix typos (Boostrapper
toBootstrapper
). (.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.md, [1]; .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.md, [2]; .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.md, [3]; .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.md, [4]Availability updates:
.docfx/includes/availability-default.md
and.docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
. (.docfx/includes/availability-default.md, [1]; .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md, [2]Package version upgrades:
Directory.Packages.props
for severalCodebelt
andCuemon
packages, as well as Microsoft packages targeting .NET 9. (Directory.Packages.props, [1] [2]Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Bug Fixes
New Features
Chores