Skip to content

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 13, 2024

This pull request includes several updates to correct namespace identifiers, update availability information, and upgrade package versions. The most important changes are grouped by theme below.

Namespace corrections:

  • Corrected uid and namespace descriptions for Codebelt.Bootstrapper and its sub-namespaces in various .docfx files to fix typos (Boostrapper to Bootstrapper). (.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.md, [1]; .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.md, [2]; .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.md, [3]; .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.md, [4]

Availability updates:

  • Updated availability information to include .NET 9 in .docfx/includes/availability-default.md and .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md. (.docfx/includes/availability-default.md, [1]; .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md, [2]

Package version upgrades:

  • Upgraded package versions from release candidates to stable versions in Directory.Packages.props for several Codebelt and Cuemon packages, as well as Microsoft packages targeting .NET 9. (Directory.Packages.props, [1] [2]

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected namespace identifiers for better accuracy in documentation across multiple files.
  • New Features

    • Updated availability information to support .NET 9 alongside .NET 8 and .NET Standard 2.0.
  • Chores

    • Transitioned several package dependencies from release candidate versions to stable versions.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request includes several corrections to namespace identifiers across multiple documentation files, changing Codebelt.Boostrapper to Codebelt.Bootstrapper. Additionally, it updates the availability information in two files to reflect support for .NET 9, removing references to .NET 6. The Directory.Packages.props file is modified to transition several package dependencies from release candidate versions to stable versions, ensuring all specified packages are now at version 9.0.0.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.md Namespace uid updated from Codebelt.Boostrapper.Console to Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.md Namespace uid updated from Codebelt.Boostrapper.Web to Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.md Namespace uid updated from Codebelt.Boostrapper.Worker to Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.
.docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.md Namespace uid updated from Codebelt.Boostrapper to Codebelt.Bootstrapper.
.docfx/includes/availability-default.md Availability updated to .NET 9, .NET 8 and .NET Standard 2.0, removing .NET 6.
.docfx/includes/availability-modern.md Availability updated to .NET 9 and .NET 8, removing .NET 6.
Directory.Packages.props Package versions updated from release candidates to stable version 9.0.0 for several packages.

Possibly related PRs

  • V2.0.0/alm+gha #1: The changes in the main PR regarding the correction of namespace identifiers are related to the updates in the Directory.Build.props file, which also includes modifications to the project structure and package references, ensuring consistency across the project.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where bunnies hop,
Namespaces corrected, we never stop!
From Boostrapper's blunder, we now see,
A stable version, as fine as can be!
With .NET 9 shining bright above,
Hopping along, we code with love! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 76f4e9d into main Nov 13, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v3.0.0/rtm branch November 13, 2024 07:14
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Directory.Packages.props (1)

Line range hint 1-32: Consider adding package version validation in CI/CD

Since this is a major version update (v3.0.0) with multiple interdependent packages, consider implementing automated package version validation in your CI/CD pipeline to ensure:

  1. All related packages maintain version synchronization
  2. No package downgrades occur accidentally
  3. Version constraints are properly enforced across different target frameworks

This will help maintain consistency in future updates.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50c8ebb and e51c29c.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.md (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.md (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.md (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.md (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-default.md (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console.md
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web.md
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker.md
  • .docfx/api/namespaces/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.md
  • .docfx/includes/availability-default.md
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Directory.Packages.props (2)

19-23: LGTM! Consistent version upgrade across Microsoft packages

Good synchronization of all Microsoft packages to stable version 9.0.0. This ensures compatibility between the core ASP.NET components.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify breaking changes and compatibility between RC2 and stable releases

# Check for any Program.cs or Startup.cs files that might need updates
fd -e cs -x grep -l "IServiceCollection\|IHostBuilder\|AddRazorRuntimeCompilation"

# Look for custom middleware or configuration setup that might be affected
rg "Configure.*Services|Configure.*Pipeline" -g "*.cs"

6-9: Verify compatibility between Codebelt and Cuemon packages

The transition from RC to stable versions looks good, but we should verify the compatibility between these packages, especially since Cuemon.Core is a fundamental dependency.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:

Updating to Cuemon v9.0.0 stable appears safe

The transition from RC to stable v9.0.0 has been thoroughly documented with multiple PRs addressing various improvements and migrations. Key observations:

  • No breaking changes reported in the changelog
  • Performance improvements for .NET 9.0+ through System.Threading.Lock
  • Proper dependency management in place with Cuemon.Core referenced correctly in Codebelt.Bootstrapper
  • Migration PRs show careful attention to compatibility (Swashbuckle, XUnit, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any compatibility issues or breaking changes in the updated packages

# Check if there are any documented breaking changes between RC and stable
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "gimlichael", name: "Cuemon") {
    releases(first: 5, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
      nodes {
        name
        description
        tagName
      }
    }
  }
}'

# Search for any dependency requirements in package configurations
rg -g "*.csproj" -g "*.props" "Cuemon.Core" -A 5

Length of output: 6310

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant