-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
V3.0.1/package maintenance #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request represents a comprehensive update to the Codebelt Bootstrapper project, focusing on version 3.0.1. The changes span multiple files and include updates to package dependencies, copyright years, and framework support. The primary modifications involve upgrading to .NET 9, removing support for .NET 6, and incrementing package versions across various components of the project. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
README.md (1)
8-8
: Format the URL as a proper markdown link.The bare URL should be formatted as a proper markdown link for better readability and to comply with markdown best practices.
Apply this diff to format the URL:
-Full documentation (generated by [DocFx](https://github.com/dotnet/docfx)) located here: https://bootstrapper.codebelt.net/ +Full documentation (generated by [DocFx](https://github.com/dotnet/docfx)) is available at [https://bootstrapper.codebelt.net/](https://bootstrapper.codebelt.net/)🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
8-8: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)
4-5
: Consider enhancing the ALM section.
- The phrase "with respect to" could be simplified to "for".
- Consider listing the specific dependencies that were updated to help users understand the impact.
Apply this diff to improve clarity:
-# ALM -- CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs +# ALM +- CHANGED Dependencies to latest versions for TFMs + - <list specific dependency updates here>🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)
1-5
: Enhance the release notes for version 3.0.1.The release notes for this patch version (3.0.1) could be more informative. Consider:
- Adding specific dependency version changes
- Listing any bug fixes that prompted this patch release
- Improving clarity by rephrasing "Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs" to "Updated package dependencies for all target frameworks"
Version 3.0.1 Availability: .NET 9 and .NET 8 # ALM -CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs +- UPDATED Package dependencies for all target frameworks: + - <package1> from x.x.x to y.y.y + - <package2> from x.x.x to y.y.y + +# Bug Fixes +- <list specific issues addressed>🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
Line range hint
1-99
: Consider moving historical release notes to a separate changelog file.The release notes file contains extensive version history dating back to 1.0.0. Consider:
- Keeping only the latest version in PackageReleaseNotes.txt
- Moving historical versions to a CHANGELOG.md file
- Using a standardized changelog format (e.g., Keep a Changelog)
This would improve maintainability while preserving the version history in a more suitable format.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)
4-5
: Consider rephrasing for clarity and conciseness.The phrase "with respect to TFMs" could be more concise. Consider alternatives:
-- CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs ++ CHANGED Dependencies to latest versions for all TFMs🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)
4-5
: Consider rephrasing for consistency with Web package.The same language improvement suggested for the Web package applies here:
-- CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs ++ CHANGED Dependencies to latest versions for all TFMs🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
.docfx/docfx.json (1)
51-51
: Consider using a dynamic copyright year.While updating the copyright year range to "2024-2025" works, consider using a dynamic approach to avoid manual updates. DocFX supports using variables or custom templates to automatically update the year.
Here's an example approach using a custom template:
- "_appFooter": "<span>Generated by <strong>DocFX</strong>. Copyright 2024-2025 Geekle. All rights reserved.</span>", + "_appFooter": "<span>Generated by <strong>DocFX</strong>. Copyright 2024-{{year}} Geekle. All rights reserved.</span>",Would you like me to provide guidance on implementing a dynamic year solution?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.docfx/Dockerfile.docfx
(1 hunks).docfx/docfx.json
(2 hunks).nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
(1 hunks).nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
(1 hunks).nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
(1 hunks).nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
(1 hunks)CHANGELOG.md
(1 hunks)Directory.Build.props
(1 hunks)Directory.Packages.props
(1 hunks)LICENSE.md
(1 hunks)README.md
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- LICENSE.md
- .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx
- CHANGELOG.md
- Directory.Build.props
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
8-8: Bare URL used
null
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (1)
Line range hint
13-18
: LGTM!The removal of trailing hyphens improves readability while maintaining proper documentation links for each project type.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
8-8: Bare URL used
null(MD034, no-bare-urls)
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)
1-2
: LGTM! Version and availability information are clear and accurate.The version increment (3.0.0 -> 3.0.1) is appropriate for a patch release containing dependency updates.
1-6
: LGTM! Release notes structure is well-organized.The file maintains a clear chronological history with proper categorization of changes (ALM, Breaking Changes, New Features, Improvements).
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...NET 8 # ALM - CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Ver...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~5-~5: ‘with respect to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...GED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs Version 3.0.0 Availability: .NET...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_RESPECT_TO)
Directory.Packages.props (1)
6-26
: LGTM! Package version updates look good.The version updates follow semantic versioning and maintain consistency across dependencies:
- Codebelt packages updated to 9.0.1 (patch)
- Microsoft packages updated to latest patch versions for both .NET 9 and .NET 8
- Test packages updated to latest stable versions
"filter": "filterConfig.yml", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"TargetFramework": "net8.0" | ||
"TargetFramework": "net9.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Framework version mismatch between documentation and projects
The docfx.json
specifies net9.0
but all project files still target net8.0
. This should be kept in sync to avoid documentation generation issues.
- Consider reverting
TargetFramework
in.docfx/docfx.json
tonet8.0
until the actual framework upgrade is performed
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify framework version consistency across the solution.
The update to net9.0
aligns with the project's upgrade strategy.
Let's verify that this change is consistent with the actual target frameworks in the project files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check target frameworks in project files
# Expected: All relevant projects should target net9.0
echo "Checking TargetFramework in project files..."
fd -e csproj . | xargs grep -l "TargetFramework" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file" | grep -A 1 -B 1 "TargetFramework"
done
Length of output: 2865
This pull request includes several updates to improve compatibility with .NET 9 and update dependencies. The most important changes include upgrading the target framework, updating package versions, and modifying metadata to reflect the new year.
Framework and Dependency Updates:
.docfx/docfx.json
fromnet8.0
tonet9.0
.Directory.Packages.props
to their latest releases, includingCodebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore
,Cuemon.Core
, andMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk
.Metadata and Documentation:
Directory.Build.props
,LICENSE.md
, and.docfx/docfx.json
to 2025. [1] [2]CHANGELOG.md
to document the service update focused on package dependencies and minor improvements.Release Notes:
Dockerfile Update:
.docfx/Dockerfile.docfx
fromnginx:1.27.0-alpine
tonginx:1.27.3-alpine
.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Dependency Updates
Chores