Skip to content

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 13, 2024

This pull request includes updates to the availability documentation and package versions to support .NET 9, along with an update to the Docker image used for testing.

Documentation Updates:

Package Version Updates:

Testing Environment Update:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated availability information to support .NET 9 alongside .NET 8 and .NET Standard 2.0.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Simplified Docker image version for the testing environment, improving consistency.
  • Chores
    • Updated package dependencies to remove release candidate suffixes, ensuring stability with version 9.0.0.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to several files to reflect the support for newer versions of .NET, specifically .NET 9. Changes were made to availability documentation in .docfx/includes/availability-default.md and .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md, updating the listed supported frameworks. Additionally, the Directory.Packages.props file was modified to remove release candidate suffixes from package versions and update the version of System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions. Lastly, the testenvironments.json file was updated to simplify the dockerImage property for the Docker-Ubuntu environment.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.docfx/includes/availability-default.md Updated availability from .NET 8, .NET 6 to .NET 9, .NET 8 and retained .NET Standard 2.0.
.docfx/includes/availability-modern.md Updated availability from .NET 8, .NET 6 to .NET 9, .NET 8.
Directory.Packages.props Updated package versions to 9.0.0 and removed -rc suffixes from several packages. Updated System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions to 4.6.0.
testenvironments.json Updated dockerImage from "gimlichael/ubuntu-testrunner:6.0.427-net8.0.403-9.0.100-rc.2.24474.11" to "gimlichael/ubuntu-testrunner:net8.0.404-9.0.100".

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the meadow, where the code does flow,
New .NET versions, oh how they glow!
With packages updated, and images bright,
Our rabbit team hops with pure delight!
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful cheer,
For .NET 9 support is finally here! 🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6340a1c and da90263.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-default.md (1 hunks)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (3 hunks)
  • testenvironments.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-default.md
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
  • testenvironments.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Directory.Packages.props (4)

14-14: Verify compatibility with .NET 9

The minor version bump to 4.6.0 needs verification for .NET 9 compatibility and potential breaking changes.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package compatibility and release notes
curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3/registration5-semver1/System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions/4.6.0/index.json" | jq -r '.items[0].catalogEntry.description'

9-9: Verify compatibility with System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions

The update to version 9.0.0 aligns with the .NET 9 target. However, we should verify compatibility with the updated System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions package.


6-8: Verify latest stable versions of Cuemon packages

The update from RC to stable versions is good. Let's verify these are the latest stable versions.


26-31: LGTM! Consistent version updates across Microsoft.Extensions packages

The update from RC to stable 9.0.0 versions is good, and all packages are consistently versioned. Let's verify these are the latest stable versions.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.58%. Comparing base (6340a1c) to head (da90263).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #21   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.58%   85.58%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines         680      680           
  Branches       84       84           
=======================================
  Hits          582      582           
  Misses         95       95           
  Partials        3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 1e3e307 into main Nov 13, 2024
21 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v9.0.0/rtm branch November 13, 2024 04:54
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 23, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant