V9.0.0/net9rc1 support #2
Conversation
➖ remove support for TFM .net6.0
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates across multiple files to support .NET 9, including modifications to project configurations, package dependencies, and release notes. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CI/CD Pipeline
participant NuGet
participant Project
User->>CI/CD Pipeline: Trigger build
CI/CD Pipeline->>Project: Check for changes
Project->>NuGet: Update package versions
NuGet-->>Project: Confirm updates
Project->>CI/CD Pipeline: Build successful
CI/CD Pipeline->>User: Notify build status
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.App/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)
4-6: ALM changes are appropriate, but consider clarifying the wording.The updates to dependencies and removal of .NET 6 support align with the PR objectives. However, for clarity, consider rephrasing line 5 to be more specific:
- CHANGED Dependencies to latest and greatest with respect to TFMs + UPDATED Dependencies to latest versions for supported Target Framework Monikers (TFMs)This change provides more precise information and explains the TFM acronym for better readability.
1-9: Overall, the release notes accurately reflect the PR objectives.The changes in this file effectively communicate the transition to .NET 9 support, the removal of .NET 6 support, and the update of dependencies. These modifications align perfectly with the PR objectives of updating the project to support .NET 9 while removing support for .NET 6.
To further enhance the release notes:
- Consider adding a brief explanation of why .NET 6 support was removed (e.g., "to focus on newer, more efficient frameworks").
- You might want to mention any potential impact on users who are still on .NET 6 and provide guidance for migration.
These additions would provide more context and help users understand the implications of this significant version update.
test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests.csproj (2)
7-9: LGTM! Consider using the latest patch version.The conditional inclusion of System.Net.Http for .NET Framework 4.8 is a good approach to maintain compatibility while updating the project. This aligns well with the PR objective of supporting .NET 9.
Consider using the latest patch version of System.Net.Http to ensure you have the most recent security updates. You can use a wildcard for the patch version like this:
- <PackageReference Include="System.Net.Http" Version="4.3.4" /> + <PackageReference Include="System.Net.Http" Version="4.3.*" />This will automatically use the latest patch version within the 4.3.x range.
Line range hint
1-22: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The updates to package versions and the conditional inclusion of System.Net.Http for .NET Framework 4.8 support the goal of updating the project to .NET 9 while maintaining compatibility. The consistent use of preview versions for Cuemon packages is noted.
Consider the following architectural advice:
- Maintain a list of preview packages used in the project and create a plan to update them to stable versions when available.
- If possible, set up automated dependency update checks to ensure you're always using the latest stable versions of packages.
- Consider adding comments in the csproj file explaining why specific package versions or conditions are used, to help future maintainers understand the rationale behind these choices.
Directory.Build.targets (1)
23-25: Excellent addition of explanatory comments.The added comments provide crucial context for the subsequent property change. They explain the rationale behind the
MinVerTagPrefixaddition, mentioning specific issues encountered during testing in Visual Studio and conflicts with other projects.Consider adding a brief mention of how the
MinVerTagPrefixproperty resolves the described issues. This would further clarify the connection between the problem and the solution..nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)
4-6: ALM changes are appropriate, but consider adding more detail.The ALM changes accurately reflect the PR objectives, including updating dependencies and removing .NET 6 support. This is good for transparency and user awareness.
Consider adding more specific information about the updated dependencies, such as version numbers or any significant changes. This would provide users with more detailed information about the updates.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
- .docfx/packages/index.md (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
- .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
- .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
- .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.App/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
- .nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- Directory.Build.props (4 hunks)
- Directory.Build.targets (2 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml.csproj (2 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.csproj (2 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.App/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.App.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/Converters/ExceptionDescriptorConverterTest.cs (2 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/Formatters/YamlFormatterOptionsTest.cs (4 hunks)
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .docfx/packages/index.md
- test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~8-~8: ‘prior to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...er.[!NOTE]
Changelog entries prior to version 8.4.0 was migrated from previou...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_PRIOR_TO)
🔇 Additional comments (36)
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.App/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)
1-2: Version and availability update looks good.The version bump to 9.0.0 and the updated availability to .NET 9 and .NET 8 align well with the PR objectives of supporting .NET 9 and removing support for .NET 6.
8-9: Retention of previous version information is helpful.Keeping the information about version 8.4.0 and its supported frameworks (.NET 8 and .NET 6) provides valuable context for users and developers. It clearly illustrates the transition from supporting .NET 6 to dropping it in favor of .NET 9.
test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests.csproj (2)
13-13: LGTM! Consistent version update.The update to version 9.0.0-preview.9 of Cuemon.Extensions.Core is consistent with the update to Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization, which is good for maintaining compatibility between related packages.
As with the previous package, be mindful of using preview versions in production environments. Run the following script to verify the impact:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of Cuemon.Extensions.Core in the codebase # Test: Search for usages of Cuemon.Extensions.Core rg --type csharp "using.*Cuemon\.Extensions\.Core" -g '!test/**/*' # Test: Check if there are any compilation errors related to this package dotnet build --no-restore
12-12: LGTM! Be cautious with preview versions in production.The update to version 9.0.0-preview.9 of Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization aligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 9.
However, be aware that this is a preview version. Ensure that you're comfortable with potential instability in a preview release. Consider adding a comment or creating an issue to remind the team to update to the stable version when it becomes available.
To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.csproj (1)
14-14: LGTM: YamlDotNet version update.The update to YamlDotNet version 16.1.3 is a minor version bump, which typically indicates bug fixes or small improvements. This change is minimal and shouldn't introduce breaking changes.
test/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.Tests.csproj (4)
11-11: LGTM: Package version updated, but note the different preview version.The update of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.Hosting.AspNetCore to version 9.0.0-preview.4 aligns with the project's move to .NET 9 support. However, it's worth noting that this package is on a different preview version (preview.4) compared to the Cuemon packages (preview.9).
To ensure this difference in preview versions is intentional and doesn't cause compatibility issues, please verify:
- Check if there are any known compatibility issues between these different preview versions.
- Confirm if this difference in versions is expected or if it should be aligned with the other packages.
Run the following script to list all package versions for easy comparison:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all package references and their versions # Test: Extract all PackageReference lines from project files # Expect: Clear view of all package versions for manual review rg --type csproj '<PackageReference' -A 1
10-10: LGTM: Consistent package version update.The update of Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore to version 9.0.0-preview.9 is consistent with the previous package update and aligns with the project's move to .NET 9 support.
To ensure version consistency across all Cuemon packages in the project, run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of Cuemon package versions # Test: Search for all Cuemon package references in project files # Expect: All Cuemon packages should use version 9.0.0-preview.9 rg --type csproj 'PackageReference Include="Cuemon' -A 1
9-9: LGTM: Package version updated to align with .NET 9.The update of Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication to version 9.0.0-preview.9 is consistent with the project's move to .NET 9 support.
Note: As this is a preview version, ensure that all developers are aware of potential instability. Consider adding a comment in the project file or documentation about the use of preview packages.
To verify the consistency of package versions across the project, run:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication version consistently set to 9.0.0-preview.9 across all project files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent use of Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication package version # Test: Search for Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication package reference in all project files # Expect: All occurrences should use version 9.0.0-preview.9 rg --type csproj 'PackageReference Include="Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication"' -A 1Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all .csproj files consistently use Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication version 9.0.0-preview.9 # Search for PackageReference to Cuemon.Extensions.AspNetCore.Authentication with the specified version rg -g "*.csproj" '<PackageReference\s+Include="Cuemon\.Extensions\.AspNetCore\.Authentication"\s+Version="9\.0\.0-preview\.9"' --files-with-matchesLength of output: 255
4-4: LGTM: Updated target frameworks align with PR objectives.The change to target .NET 9 and .NET 8 is in line with the PR's goal of supporting .NET 9 while removing .NET 6 support. This update ensures the project stays current with the latest .NET versions.
To ensure all project files are consistently updated, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: All relevant test project files target .NET 9.0 and .NET 8.0 as intended.
The target frameworks have been correctly updated to .NET 9.0 and .NET 8.0 in
Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.Tests.csproj. No further issues detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test projects have been updated to target .NET 9 and .NET 8 # Test: Search for TargetFrameworks in all test project files # Expect: All test projects should target net9.0 and net8.0 fd -e csproj --exec grep -H '<TargetFrameworks>' {} test/Length of output: 864
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test project files target both .NET 9.0 and .NET 8.0 # Test: Search for <TargetFrameworks> in all test project files and verify the frameworks # Expect: Each <TargetFrameworks> tag should include both net9.0 and net8.0 fd -e csproj -t f test/ --exec grep -H '<TargetFrameworks>net9.0;net8.0</TargetFrameworks>' {}Length of output: 424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all test project files target both .NET 9.0 and .NET 8.0 # Test: Search for <TargetFrameworks> in all .csproj files within the test/ directory and verify the frameworks # Expect: Each <TargetFrameworks> tag should include both net9.0 and net8.0 fd '.' 'test/' -e csproj -t f --exec grep -H '<TargetFrameworks>net9.0;net8.0</TargetFrameworks>' {}Length of output: 261
src/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.App/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.App.csproj (2)
Line range hint
1-24: Confirm no additional changes needed for .NET 9 supportThe update to TargetFrameworks is sufficient for this file. No other changes appear necessary to support .NET 9 in this project file. The project references and other configurations are version-agnostic and should work with the new target frameworks.
To ensure all necessary updates have been made, let's check for any .NET 9 specific configurations that might be missing:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for .NET 9 specific configurations in other project files # Expected result: Any .NET 9 specific configurations that might be relevant for this project rg --type xml 'net9\.0' -g '*.csproj' -C 5
4-4: TargetFrameworks updated to support .NET 9The change from
net8.0;net6.0tonet9.0;net8.0aligns with the PR objectives of supporting .NET 9 and removing support for .NET 6. This update ensures the project targets the latest .NET versions.To ensure consistency across the project, let's verify if other files need similar updates:
✅ Verification successful
All references to .NET 6.0 have been successfully removed
The shell script check returned no instances of
net6.0in any project files, confirming that .NET 6.0 is no longer targeted.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to net6.0 in project files # Expected result: No output, indicating no remaining net6.0 references rg --type xml 'net6\.0' -g '*.csproj'Length of output: 5406
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (4)
1-2: Version and availability update looks good.The version bump to 9.0.0 and the updated availability information (.NET 9 and .NET 8) align perfectly with the PR objectives of supporting .NET 9 and removing support for .NET 6.
6-6: Removal of .NET 6 support is noted.The removal of support for .NET 6 (LTS) aligns with the PR objectives. However, as this is a breaking change that affects an LTS version, it's crucial to ensure users are well-informed.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Highlight this breaking change prominently in the main README file.
- Create or update a migration guide to assist users in transitioning from .NET 6 to .NET 8 or 9.
- Update any relevant documentation to reflect this change in supported versions.
1-6: Release notes accurately reflect the major changes.The release notes for version 9.0.0 clearly communicate the following key points:
- The upgrade to .NET 9 support
- The continued support for .NET 8
- The removal of .NET 6 support
- The update of dependencies to their latest versions
These changes align well with the PR objectives and provide a clear summary for users of the package.
4-5: Dependency updates are appropriate.Updating dependencies to the latest versions is a good practice when upgrading to a new major .NET version. This change is consistent with the PR objectives.
To ensure all dependencies are correctly updated, please run the following script to check the project file:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml.csproj (2)
14-14: Approved: Updated Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc package to version 9.0.0-preview.9The package reference has been updated to align with the new .NET 9 support. This is a necessary change to ensure compatibility with the latest framework version.
However, please note that this is a preview version (9.0.0-preview.9). Consider the following:
- Ensure that all features used from this package are stable and working as expected in your project.
- Be prepared for potential breaking changes or updates as the package moves towards its final release.
- Plan to update to the stable version once it's released.
To verify the consistency of package versions across the project, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc package versions # Test: Search for Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc package references # Expect: All references should use version 9.0.0-preview.9 rg --type csproj 'PackageReference Include="Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc"' . | rg -v '9\.0\.0-preview\.9'
4-4: Approved: Target frameworks updated to .NET 9 and 8The change aligns with the PR objectives of updating to .NET 9 and removing .NET 6 support. This forward-looking update ensures compatibility with the latest .NET versions.
Consider adding a note in the release documentation about the removal of .NET 6 support, as it might affect users still on that version. Also, since .NET 9 is still in preview, it might be worth mentioning any potential instability or changes that could occur before the final release.
To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
src/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.csproj (3)
15-15: LGTM: Cuemon.Extensions.DependencyInjection package updated consistently.The package version has been updated to 9.0.0-preview.9, maintaining consistency with the Cuemon.AspNetCore package update.
This change is in line with the previous package update. Please refer to the comment on line 14 regarding checking for breaking changes, as the same considerations apply here.
14-14: LGTM: Cuemon.AspNetCore package updated to match .NET 9.The package version has been updated to 9.0.0-preview.9, which aligns with the move to .NET 9. This is appropriate for the project's new target framework.
To ensure all Cuemon packages are consistently updated and to check for potential breaking changes, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Cuemon package versions and fetch changelog # Test: Check for consistent Cuemon package versions echo "Checking Cuemon package versions:" rg --type csproj '<PackageReference Include="Cuemon[^"]+" Version="([^"]+)"' -o -r '$1' | sort | uniq -c # Fetch and display the changelog for Cuemon.AspNetCore echo "\nFetching Cuemon.AspNetCore changelog:" gh release view --repo https://github.com/gimlichael/Cuemon 9.0.0-preview.9 --json body --jq .bodyPlease review the changelog for any breaking changes that might affect your project.
4-4: LGTM: Target frameworks updated as intended.The change aligns with the PR objectives by adding .NET 9 support and removing .NET 6. This update keeps the project current with the latest .NET versions.
To ensure consistency across the solution, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
: Target frameworks have been successfully updated.
All project files no longer reference
.NET 6.0and now target.NET 9.0and.NET 8.0as intended.
No further issues detected regarding target framework configurations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify target frameworks across all project files # Test: Check for any remaining references to net6.0 and list all unique TargetFrameworks echo "Checking for net6.0 references:" rg --type csproj 'net6\.0' -l echo "\nListing all unique TargetFrameworks:" rg --type csproj '<TargetFrameworks>([^<]+)</TargetFrameworks>' -o -r '$1' | sort | uniqLength of output: 422
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify target frameworks across all project files without relying on predefined file types # Test: Check for any remaining references to net6.0 and list all unique TargetFrameworks echo "Checking for net6.0 references:" rg 'net6\.0' --glob '*.csproj' -l echo -e "\nListing all unique TargetFrameworks:" rg '<TargetFrameworks>([^<]+)</TargetFrameworks>' --glob '*.csproj' -o -r '$1' | sort | uniq # Verify existence of the specified release in the repository echo -e "\nFetching available releases for Cuemon.AspNetCore repository:" gh release list --repo gimlichael/Cuemon.AspNetCore echo -e "\nFetching Cuemon.AspNetCore changelog for version 9.0.0-preview.9:" gh release view 9.0.0-preview.9 --repo gimlichael/Cuemon.AspNetCore --json body --jq .bodyLength of output: 1388
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (3)
1-2: Version and availability update looks good.The version bump to 9.0.0 and the updated availability information accurately reflect the PR's objective of supporting .NET 9 while removing support for .NET 6.
Line range hint
8-38: Comprehensive changelog maintained.It's commendable that the file maintains a history of previous releases. This practice provides valuable context for users and developers, showing the evolution of the package over time.
4-6: ALM changes are in line with PR objectives.The updates to dependencies and removal of .NET 6 (LTS) support align with the PR's goals. However, it's worth noting that removing LTS support might impact users who rely on long-term support versions. Ensure that this change has been communicated clearly to the user base and that migration guidelines are provided if necessary.
To verify the removal of .NET 6 support across the project, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: .NET 6 Support Removed
The removal of .NET 6 (LTS) support has been successfully verified, with no remaining references to .NET 6 found in project files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to .NET 6 in project files # Test: Search for .NET 6 references in .csproj files echo "Checking for .NET 6 references in .csproj files:" rg --type xml 'net6' -g '*.csproj' # Test: Search for .NET 6 references in .props files echo "Checking for .NET 6 references in .props files:" rg --type xml 'net6' -g '*.props' # Test: Search for .NET 6 references in .targets files echo "Checking for .NET 6 references in .targets files:" rg --type xml 'net6' -g '*.targets'Length of output: 425
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to .NET 6 in project files with improved search patterns # Test: Search for .NET 6 references with version numbers in .csproj files echo "Checking for .NET 6 references in .csproj files with improved patterns:" rg --type xml 'net6\.\d+' -g '*.csproj' # Test: Search for .NET 6 references with version numbers in .props files echo "Checking for .NET 6 references in .props files with improved patterns:" rg --type xml 'net6\.\d+' -g '*.props' # Test: Search for .NET 6 references with version numbers in .targets files echo "Checking for .NET 6 references in .targets files with improved patterns:" rg --type xml 'net6\.\d+' -g '*.targets'Length of output: 584
Directory.Build.targets (2)
4-4: LGTM: Improved formatting forPackageReleaseNotesFileproperty.The reformatting of the
PackageReleaseNotesFileproperty enhances readability without changing functionality. This change aligns with best practices for XML formatting.
26-28: Approve addition ofMinVerTagPrefixproperty with verification.The addition of the
MinVerTagPrefixproperty addresses the issues described in the preceding comments. This change is likely to resolve the assembly loading problems encountered during testing.To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please verify:
- The impact on version generation across the project.
- Compatibility with existing version tags in the repository.
Run the following script to check existing tags and how they might be affected:
This will help ensure that the new
MinVerTagPrefixis consistent with your versioning strategy across the project.✅ Verification successful
MinVerTagPrefix Addition Verified Successfully.
The new
MinVerTagPrefixproperty has been added correctly and aligns with existing Git tags, all of which start with 'v'. No other conflictingMinVerTagPrefixconfigurations were found in the repository.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check existing tags and their compatibility with the new MinVerTagPrefix # List all tags echo "Existing tags:" git tag # Check for tags that don't start with 'v' echo -e "\nTags not starting with 'v':" git tag | grep -v "^v" # If using MinVer in other projects, check their configurations echo -e "\nOther MinVer configurations:" rg --type xml "MinVerTagPrefix" --glob "!Directory.Build.targets"Length of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check existing tags and their compatibility with the new MinVerTagPrefix echo "Existing tags:" git tag echo -e "\nTags not starting with 'v':" git tag | grep -v "^v" echo -e "\nOther MinVer configurations in the repository:" rg --type xml "MinVerTagPrefix" # Provide debug information if no results are found if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo -e "\nNo MinVerTagPrefix configurations found outside Directory.Build.targets." echo "Please ensure that other configuration files are present or adjust the search parameters accordingly." fiLength of output: 832
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for MinVerTagPrefix configurations across all file types echo "Existing tags:" git tag echo -e "\nTags not starting with 'v':" git tag | grep -v "^v" echo -e "\nSearching for MinVerTagPrefix in all files (case-insensitive):" rg -i "MinVerTagPrefix" --ignore-directory=node_modules --ignore-file=.gitignore # Provide debug information if no results are found if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo -e "\nNo MinVerTagPrefix configurations found outside Directory.Build.targets." echo "Please verify manually if necessary." fiLength of output: 1083
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for MinVerTagPrefix configurations across all file types echo "Existing tags:" git tag echo -e "\nTags not starting with 'v':" git tag | grep -v "^v" echo -e "\nSearching for MinVerTagPrefix in all files (case-insensitive):" rg -i "MinVerTagPrefix" --ignore-dir=node_modules --ignore-file=.gitignore # Provide debug information if no results are found if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo -e "\nNo MinVerTagPrefix configurations found outside Directory.Build.targets." echo "Please verify manually if necessary." fiLength of output: 1071
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for MinVerTagPrefix configurations across all file types echo "Existing tags:" git tag echo -e "\nTags not starting with 'v':" git tag | grep -v "^v" echo -e "\nSearching for MinVerTagPrefix in all files (case-insensitive) using ripgrep:" rg -i "MinVerTagPrefix" --ignore-dir node_modules --ignore-file .gitignore # Check if ripgrep search was successful if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo -e "\nRipgrep failed to execute properly. Attempting to search using grep as a fallback." echo -e "\nSearching for MinVerTagPrefix using grep:" grep -ri "MinVerTagPrefix" --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-from=.gitignore . if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo -e "\nNo MinVerTagPrefix configurations found outside Directory.Build.targets." echo "Please verify manually if necessary." fi fiLength of output: 1303
test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/Formatters/YamlFormatterOptionsTest.cs (4)
22-24: LGTM: Simplified YamlFormatterOptions instantiationThe removal of the namespace prefix
Cuemon.Extensions.YamlDotNet.FormattersfromYamlFormatterOptionsinstantiation improves code readability. This change suggests that theYamlFormatterOptionsclass is now in the same namespace as the test class or has been properly imported.
38-40: LGTM: Consistent simplification of YamlFormatterOptions instantiationThe removal of the namespace prefix for
YamlFormatterOptionsis consistent with the previous change. This maintains improved code readability throughout the test class.
Line range hint
54-63: LGTM: Consistent updates to YamlFormatterOptions usageThe changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous modifications:
- The
YamlFormatterOptionsinstantiation has been simplified (line 54).- The assertion for
DefaultMediaTypehas been updated to useYamlFormatterOptions.DefaultMediaTypedirectly (line 63), which aligns with the removal of the namespace prefix.These changes improve code readability and maintain a consistent approach throughout the test class.
Line range hint
1-70: Overall: Consistent simplification of YamlFormatterOptions usageThe changes in this file consistently simplify the usage of
YamlFormatterOptionsby removing namespace prefixes. This improves code readability and reduces verbosity throughout the test class. All modifications appear to be correct and maintain the original functionality.To ensure consistency across the entire codebase:
.nuget/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (2)
1-1: Version number update looks good.The increment to version 9.0.0 aligns with the PR objective of supporting .NET 9 and indicates potential breaking changes, which is appropriate given the removal of .NET 6 support.
2-2: Availability update is correct.The updated availability accurately reflects the PR objectives by including .NET 9 and removing .NET 6. Maintaining support for .NET Standard 2.0 ensures good backward compatibility.
Directory.Build.props (4)
52-52: LGTM! Test frameworks updated for Linux.The update to include .NET 9.0 and remove .NET 6.0 for Linux test projects is consistent with the PR objectives and maintains the correct order of frameworks.
56-56: LGTM! Test frameworks updated for Windows.The update to include .NET 9.0 and remove .NET 6.0 for Windows test projects is consistent with the PR objectives. Retaining .NET Framework 4.8 ensures compatibility with older Windows environments.
73-74: Package updates look good. Verify Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit compatibility.The xunit package updates to 2.9.2 are minor and should be safe. However, the Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit update to 9.0.0-preview.4 is a major version bump to a preview release.
Please ensure that the new version of Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit is compatible with your test suite. Run the following command to check for any breaking changes or deprecations:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential breaking changes in Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit usage # Test: Search for Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit usage rg --type csharp 'Codebelt\.Extensions\.Xunit'Also applies to: 84-84
18-18: LGTM! Verify potential breaking changes.The update to include .NET 9.0 and remove .NET 6.0 aligns with the PR objectives. Maintaining .NET Standard 2.0 ensures backward compatibility.
Please run the following script to check for any usage of .NET 6.0 specific APIs that might need to be updated:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: No .NET 6.0-specific APIs found.
The search did not detect any usage of .NET 6.0-specific APIs or attributes. No potential breaking changes identified.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for .NET 6.0 specific APIs usage # Test: Search for .NET 6.0 specific APIs or attributes rg --type csharp '(#if NET6_0|[Attribute]\(NET6_0\))'Length of output: 998
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)
9-9: LGTM: Ignoring Markdown files in pull request triggers.This change prevents the CI/CD pipeline from running unnecessarily when only documentation files are modified. It aligns with the PR objectives and is a good practice for optimizing CI/CD resources.
| <ItemGroup> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Cuemon.Extensions.IO" Version="8.3.2" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="YamlDotNet" Version="16.1.2" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Cuemon.Extensions.IO" Version="9.0.0-preview.9" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Multiple projects are referencing preview versions of Cuemon packages.
The Cuemon.Extensions.IO package is used with version 9.0.0-preview.9 in several projects:
test/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Tests.csprojtest/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.Tests/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.Tests.csprojsrc/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet/Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.csprojsrc/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Text.Yaml.csprojsrc/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml/Codebelt.Extensions.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.Text.Yaml.csproj
Using preview versions can introduce instability and compatibility issues. Please confirm if this is intentional and assess the potential impacts on the project.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider the implications of using a preview version.
The update to Cuemon.Extensions.IO version 9.0.0-preview.9 aligns with the goal of supporting .NET 9. However, using a preview version in a production environment might introduce instability.
Please confirm if this is intentional and if there are plans to update to a stable version once it's released. Also, ensure that this preview version is compatible with other dependencies in the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other preview versions and potential incompatibilities
# Test: Search for other preview versions
echo "Other preview versions:"
rg --type xml -g '*.csproj' 'Version="[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+-preview\.[0-9]+"'
# Test: Check if Cuemon.Extensions.IO is used in the codebase
echo "Usage of Cuemon.Extensions.IO:"
rg --type csharp 'using Cuemon\.Extensions\.IO'
Length of output: 2382
| { | ||
| var sut = new ExceptionDescriptor(ex, "X900", "Critical Error."); | ||
| var formatter = new YamlFormatter(o => o.Settings.Converters.Add(new Cuemon.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Converters.ExceptionDescriptorConverter(io => io.SensitivityDetails = FaultSensitivityDetails.All))); | ||
| var formatter = new YamlFormatter(o => o.Settings.Converters.Add(new ExceptionDescriptorConverter(io => io.SensitivityDetails = FaultSensitivityDetails.All))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Namespace Verification Required
The ExceptionDescriptorConverter class has been moved to the Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Converters namespace. Please ensure that all references to this class are updated accordingly to maintain consistency and prevent potential referencing issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Simplified namespace reference.
The removal of the namespace prefix Cuemon.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Converters. from ExceptionDescriptorConverter improves code readability without changing the functionality. This suggests that the ExceptionDescriptorConverter class is now directly accessible in the current namespace or through one of the existing using statements.
To ensure the correct ExceptionDescriptorConverter is being referenced, please run the following script:
This script will help verify that the ExceptionDescriptorConverter is correctly defined and imported in the current context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct ExceptionDescriptorConverter is being used
# Test 1: Check for the presence of ExceptionDescriptorConverter in the current namespace
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'namespace Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet.Converters { $$$ class ExceptionDescriptorConverter $$$ }'
# Test 2: Check for any using statements that might include ExceptionDescriptorConverter
rg --type csharp 'using .*ExceptionDescriptorConverter;'
# Test 3: Check for any other occurrences of ExceptionDescriptorConverter in the codebase
rg --type csharp 'class ExceptionDescriptorConverter'
Length of output: 903
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml
Outdated
| matrix: | ||
| configuration: [Debug, Release] | ||
| framework: [net8.0,net6.0,netstandard2.0] | ||
| framework: [net9.0;net8.0,netstandard2.0] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove remaining .NET 6 references.
-
Found a .NET 6 reference in
testenvironments.json:"dockerImage": "gimlichael/ubuntu-testrunner:net6.0.424-net8.0.303"
-
Please update the docker image to exclude .NET 6 or align it with the PR objectives.
🔗 Analysis chain
Fix syntax and clarify framework support.
-
There appears to be a syntax error in the framework matrix. The semicolon after
net9.0should be a comma. -
The PR objectives mention removing support for .NET 6, but this isn't reflected in the changes. Please clarify if .NET 6 support should be removed from other configuration files.
Apply this fix to correct the syntax:
- framework: [net9.0;net8.0,netstandard2.0]
+ framework: [net9.0,netstandard2.0]To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following command to check for any remaining references to .NET 6:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for .NET 6 references in project files
rg --type xml 'net6.0' -g '*.csproj'
rg --type xml 'net6.0' -g '*.props'
rg --type xml 'net6.0' -g '*.targets'
Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Comprehensive search for .NET 6 references in various project and configuration files
rg 'net6.0' -g '*.csproj' -g '*.props' -g '*.targets' -g '*.sln' -g '*.json' -g '*.config'
Length of output: 192
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Directory.Build.targets (3)
18-19: LGTM: FileVersion update looks good, with a minor suggestionThe changes to the
ApplyFileVersiontarget look good:
- The introduction of
GITHUB_RUN_NUMBERwith a default value is a good practice.- Updating
FileVersionto useGITHUB_RUN_NUMBERaligns well with GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline.Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of
GITHUB_RUN_NUMBERfor better documentation. For example:<!-- GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER is provided by GitHub Actions and represents the build number --> <GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER Condition="'$(GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER)' == ''">0</GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER>
23-25: Great addition of explanatory commentsThe added comments provide valuable context about compatibility issues, workarounds, and the rationale behind certain changes. This information is crucial for maintainability and helps other developers understand the project's constraints.
To improve readability, consider formatting the comments as an XML comment block:
<!-- Had to use this as testing in Visual Studio (both built-in and Resharper) failed with "Could not load file or assembly 'Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet' ..." for .NET Framework. However, dotnet test works fine - simply producing a MSB3277 due to the fact that this project is in conflict with one of the SUT that relies on the NuGet equivalent to this project. Since assembly redirects is not supported in .NET, this was the workaround that has the least impact (normally this is applied only in CI/CD pipeline). -->
26-28: LGTM: Addition of MinVerTagPrefix propertyThe addition of the
MinVerTagPrefixproperty set to "v" is a good practice for semantic versioning with MinVer. This aligns with common Git tagging conventions and the earlier comments about workarounds for testing issues.For better clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this property:
<PropertyGroup> <!-- Prefix for version tags in Git, used by MinVer for semantic versioning --> <MinVerTagPrefix>v</MinVerTagPrefix> </PropertyGroup>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (3 hunks)
- Directory.Build.targets (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pipelines.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Directory.Build.targets (1)
4-4: LGTM: PackageReleaseNotesFile property is well-definedThe
PackageReleaseNotesFileproperty is correctly defined with a relative path, which is good for portability. The use of$(MSBuildProjectName)ensures that the correct project-specific file is referenced.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.94% 86.66% +0.72%
==========================================
Files 15 15
Lines 555 555
Branches 47 47
==========================================
+ Hits 477 481 +4
+ Misses 78 74 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
1 participant
PR Classification
Documentation and framework update to support .NET 9 and remove .NET 6.
PR Summary
Updated project to support .NET 9, removed .NET 6, and made documentation and dependency updates.
pipelines.yml: Ignored markdown files in PR triggers, updated target frameworks,Directory.Build.props: Changed target frameworks, updated package references,PackageReleaseNotes.txt: Introduced version 9.0.0, noted .NET 6 removal,index.md: Updated NuGet package name and search link.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
Tests