Skip to content

#1363. Minor code improvement #1390

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks to @lrhn who noticed this

Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure these changes are improvements..

sent.forEach((element) {
Expect.isTrue([1, 2, 3].contains(element));
});
Expect.isTrue(sent.isNotEmpty);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This means that we will no longer detect if there's a bug (in tools or in the test) that makes element == 49283398?

Next, generator may suspend when a data event has been added to the returned stream, and this means that we could have [1] in sent, but we could also have [1, 2] or [1, 2, 3]. The test that we used to have verified that we have one of these possibilities except for the ordering, but the new code is considerably less precise.

I actually liked the old version better.

sent.forEach((element) {
Expect.isTrue([1, 2, 3].contains(element));
});
Expect.isTrue(sent.length > 1);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same thing.

@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's leave it as it is now

@sgrekhov sgrekhov closed this Aug 16, 2022
@sgrekhov sgrekhov deleted the co19-1363-5 branch September 29, 2022 09:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants