-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.3k
Use Pipelines in PlaintextApp sample #7227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
02fac9f
to
a082669
Compare
@benaadams agreed, we should probably avoid merging this PR until #7110 is in. |
9da7e32
to
7c36421
Compare
Called it |
internal static class ValueTaskExtensions | ||
{ | ||
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)] | ||
public static Task GetAsTask(this in ValueTask<FlushResult> valueTask) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like this could be submitted as an improvement to AsTask?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its converting a result type ValueTask<T>
task-like to a non-result type Task
AsTask()
would covert it to Task<T>
would need a different name to work with overloading?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, this would need to go into pipelines itself.
/AzurePipelines run AspNetCore-ci |
Any reason this wasn't merged... 2 months ago 😱? Looks approved and builds are green... |
Forgot, or the perf tests weren’t running |
Are we good to merge or is there something we're waiting on? |
Guess it would be a regression until #7110 is merged?
/cc @davidfowl @jkotalik
@halter73 @pakrym @Tratcher