Skip to content

Use Pipelines in PlaintextApp sample #7227

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 25, 2019

Conversation

benaadams
Copy link
Member

Guess it would be a regression until #7110 is merged?

/cc @davidfowl @jkotalik

@halter73 @pakrym @Tratcher

@jkotalik
Copy link
Contributor

jkotalik commented Feb 4, 2019

@benaadams agreed, we should probably avoid merging this PR until #7110 is in.

@benaadams
Copy link
Member Author

Called it GetAsTask

internal static class ValueTaskExtensions
{
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
public static Task GetAsTask(this in ValueTask<FlushResult> valueTask)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like this could be submitted as an improvement to AsTask?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Its converting a result type ValueTask<T> task-like to a non-result type Task

AsTask() would covert it to Task<T> would need a different name to work with overloading?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, this would need to go into pipelines itself.

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

/AzurePipelines run AspNetCore-ci

@jkotalik jkotalik self-assigned this Feb 6, 2019
@analogrelay
Copy link
Contributor

Any reason this wasn't merged... 2 months ago 😱? Looks approved and builds are green...

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

Forgot, or the perf tests weren’t running

@analogrelay
Copy link
Contributor

Are we good to merge or is there something we're waiting on?

@analogrelay analogrelay merged commit 44b2768 into dotnet:master May 25, 2019
@BrennanConroy BrennanConroy mentioned this pull request May 25, 2019
@amcasey amcasey added area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions and removed area-runtime labels Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-networking Includes servers, yarp, json patch, bedrock, websockets, http client factory, and http abstractions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants