-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 772
{toolchain}[dummy] intel 2016.02-GCC-5.3 (REVIEW) #2523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c08bd4a
{toolchain}[dummy] intel 2016.02
boegel 3807a51
bump GCC to 5.3.0
boegel b286012
add icc/ifort/impi/imkl easyconfigs for intel/2016.02 + HPL as testcase
boegel adbae79
add clarifying comment
boegel 42f8389
rename to intel/2016.02-GCC-5.3
boegel d8bf857
use HOME constant in new icc/ifort/imkl/impi easyconfigs
boegel d8b707a
add missing '/'
boegel ef9cacb
Merge branch 'develop' into intel201602
boegel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
| # This is an easyconfig file for EasyBuild, see http://hpcugent.github.io/easybuild | ||
| easyblock = "Toolchain" | ||
|
|
||
| name = 'intel' | ||
| version = '2016.02' | ||
|
|
||
| homepage = 'http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-cluster-toolkit-compiler/' | ||
| description = """Intel Cluster Toolkit Compiler Edition provides Intel C/C++ and Fortran compilers, Intel MPI & Intel MKL.""" | ||
|
|
||
| toolchain = {'name': 'dummy', 'version': 'dummy'} | ||
|
|
||
| compver = '2016.2.181' | ||
| gccver = '4.9.3' | ||
|
||
| binutilsver = '2.26' | ||
| gccsuff = '-GCC-%s-%s' % (gccver, binutilsver) | ||
| dependencies = [ | ||
| ('GCCcore', gccver), | ||
| ('binutils', binutilsver, '-GCCcore-%s' % gccver), | ||
| ('icc', compver, gccsuff), | ||
| ('ifort', compver, gccsuff), | ||
| ('impi', '5.1.3.181', '', ('iccifort', '%s%s' % (compver, gccsuff))), | ||
| ('imkl', '11.3.2.181', '', ('iimpi', '%s%s' % (version, gccsuff))), | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| moduleclass = 'toolchain' | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good and useful PR, nice to see it merged.
As said during meeting today: it would be good to have a
-GCC-5.3.0suffix, to make room for-GCC-4.9.3There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
like this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
alternative in #2620
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeap, thanks for the GCC-4.x PR.
IMHO,
binutils/2.26would likely be preferable by EB community,in the name of supporting more architectures;
this might, just might, make it less of an issue the 5.1 vs 5.3 debate... (fingers crossed)