Skip to content

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Mar 2, 2016

(created using eb --new-pr)

requires #2524 (for binutils-2.26.eb)

…ils-2.26-GCCcore-4.9.3.eb, add easyconfig flex-2.6.0-GCCcore-4.9.3.eb, add easyconfig icc-2016.2.181-GCC-4.9.3-2.26.eb, add easyconfig iccifort-2016.2.181-GCC-4.9.3-2.26.eb, add easyconfig ifort-2016.2.181-GCC-4.9.3-2.26.eb, add easyconfig iimpi-2016.02-GCC-4.9.3-2.26.eb, add easyconfig imkl-11.3.2.181-iimpi-2016.02-GCC-4.9.3-2.26.eb, add easyconfig impi-5.1.3.181-iccifort-2016.2.181-GCC-4.9.3-2.26.eb, add easyconfig intel-2016.02-GCC-4.9.eb
@hpcugentbot
Copy link

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6743/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel boegel added this to the v2.7.0 milestone Mar 2, 2016
@fgeorgatos
Copy link
Contributor

@boegel: visual review ok here, thanks!

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2653.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/e791ce96bb1459062d1f for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2111.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/b14ee61ee1a8c47d0035 for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7094/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7095/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2699.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/57228543b09fdf450a76 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2016

reworked to stick to binutils 2.25 for this one

I'd like to get this in for EasyBuild v2.7.0...

Thoughts @wpoely86?

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 14, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2148.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/5050f82160ce9ace163d for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 15, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2148.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/7fde6f815e943558c9b9 for a full test report.

dontcreateinstalldir = 'True'

# license file
import os
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought we didn't need this anymore?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point, I'll get rid of it

@hpcugentbot
Copy link

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7118/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 15, 2016

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2034.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/9e57e4a4e47f2f00ca15 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 15, 2016

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2626.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/150e7bf6baa5dac9c916 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 15, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2653.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/9bc668db847c0375648b for a full test report.

@hpcugentbot
Copy link

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7123/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 15, 2016

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (9 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2111.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/4db5396b6a7c416783a0 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 15, 2016

Going in, thanks for the feedback @wpoely86, @ocaisa and @fgeorgatos!

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2016
{toolchain}[dummy] intel/2016.02-GCC-4.9
@boegel boegel merged commit b268095 into easybuilders:develop Mar 15, 2016
@boegel boegel deleted the 20160302185732_new_pr_HPL21 branch March 15, 2016 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants