{compiler}[dummy] GCC 5.3.0-2.26 (REVIEW) #2524

boegel · 2016-02-18T22:13:01Z

dep for #2523

boegel · 2016-02-18T22:33:49Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 3 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/8266463bdcdd9bdd1b52 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-18T23:00:10Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 3 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ee120aacaaad5906280c for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-18T23:01:45Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 3 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/b2543e71c4ab9e120ddb for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-18T23:23:57Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 3 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/13e4e5a0a7258cee3c41 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-18T23:34:57Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 3 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/5136fff21cbdcb86e220 for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-18T23:43:12Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6348/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-02-19T16:17:38Z

failing test reports are caused by download issues, do ignore...

boegel · 2016-02-19T18:00:57Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/1df1ce5b76e0fce053cf for a full test report.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-19T18:39:25Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6406/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-02-19T19:26:41Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/168c50a2f89f3276098a for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-19T19:39:47Z

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 7 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/bb9a42d3c28d39f45aa7 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-19T21:49:09Z

Hmm, not sure what the issue is here...

/bin/sh ../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -fPIC -O2 -march=native -version-info 2:0:0 -L/user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/lib64 -L/user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/lib -L/user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/Bison/3.0.4-GCCcore-5.3.0/lib -o libfl.la -rpath /user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/flex/2.6.0-GCCcore-5.3.0/lib libmain.lo libyywrap.lo  -lm -lm -lpthread
libtool: link: gcc -shared  -fPIC -DPIC  .libs/libmain.o .libs/libyywrap.o   -L/user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/lib64 -L/user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/lib -L/user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/Bison/3.0.4-GCCcore-5.3.0/lib -lm -lpthread  -O2 -march=native   -Wl,-soname -Wl,libfl.so.2 -o .libs/libfl.so.2.0.0
/bin/ld.gold: error: /user/scratchdelcatty/gent/gvo000/gvo00002/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.3.0/crtbeginS.o: unsupported reloc 42 against global symbol _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable
/bin/ld.gold: error: /user/scratchdelcatty/gent/gvo000/gvo00002/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.3.0/crtbeginS.o: unsupported reloc 42 against global symbol _ITM_registerTMCloneTable
/bin/ld.gold: error: /user/scratchdelcatty/gent/gvo000/gvo00002/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.3.0/crtbeginS.o: unsupported reloc 42 against global symbol _Jv_RegisterClasses
/user/scratchdelcatty/gent/gvo000/gvo00002/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.3.0/crtbeginS.o(.text+0x1e): error: unsupported reloc 42
/user/scratchdelcatty/gent/gvo000/gvo00002/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.3.0/crtbeginS.o(.text+0x6b): error: unsupported reloc 42
/user/scratchdelcatty/gent/gvo000/gvo00002/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/CO7/haswell-ib/software/GCCcore/5.3.0/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.3.0/crtbeginS.o(.text+0xeb): error: unsupported reloc 42
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [libfl.la] Error 1

boegel · 2016-02-19T21:49:43Z

@ocaisa: does this ring any bells for you?

ocaisa · 2016-02-20T08:59:48Z

No, but I haven't tried binutils 2.26 and it looks like that's where the problem arises. I read the bug report at https://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2015/12/msg00248.html and it says that new relocations affect all static libs...is that a fundamental problem?

On 19 Feb 2016 22:49, "Kenneth Hoste" <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

@ocaisahttps://github.com/ocaisa: does this ring any bells for you?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/2524#issuecomment-186423937.

Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender),
Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,

Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt

boegel · 2016-02-27T16:57:47Z

@ocaisa: the problem seems to be that flex being built with GCC/5.3.0 didn't include a build dep on binutils/2.26; that's a hard requirement now, because of changes made in binutils 2.26: you need to build the whole stack on top of 2.26, you can't mix with the older 2.25...

going to retest this

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-27T17:18:07Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6629/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-27T17:18:44Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6630/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-02-27T17:52:17Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/6a0f773191a9e4c478bc for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-27T18:01:48Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/66fef9cd076a7301dd66 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-02-27T18:24:32Z

@ocaisa: \o/

boegel · 2016-02-27T18:31:20Z

@wpoely86: please review?

wpoely86 · 2016-02-29T08:56:56Z

easybuild/easyconfigs/b/binutils/binutils-2.26-GCCcore-5.3.0.eb

+
+# statically link with zlib, to avoid runtime dependency on zlib
+preconfigopts = 'LIBS="$EBROOTZLIB/lib/libz.a"'
+prebuildopts = 'LIBS="$EBROOTZLIB/lib/libz.a"'


Check that the resulting binutils is statically linked

how? manually?

or via a sanity check command?

Hah, it's not (to libz)...

$ ldd /user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/SL6/sandybridge/software/binutils/2.26-GCCcore-5.3.0/bin/ar linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff1d180000) /usr/$LIB/libsnoopy.so => /usr/lib64/libsnoopy.so (0x00002b331abeb000) libbfd-2.26.20160125.so => /user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/SL6/sandybridge/software/binutils/2.26-GCCcore-5.3.0/lib/libbfd-2.26.20160125.so (0x00002b331a9eb000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00002b331adfa000) libfl.so.2 => /user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/SL6/sandybridge/software/flex/2.6.0-GCCcore-5.3.0/lib/libfl.so.2 (0x00002b331b010000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002b331b013000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002b331b297000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00002b331b4b4000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b331b6b9000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00002b331a9c9000)

It is for binutils 2.25 w/ GCCcore 4.9.3 though:

ldd /user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/SL6/sandybridge/software/binutils/2.25-GCCcore-4.9.3/bin/ar linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffc3afff000) /usr/$LIB/libsnoopy.so => /usr/lib64/libsnoopy.so (0x00002b09d3447000) libbfd-2.25.so => /user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/SL6/sandybridge/software/binutils/2.25-GCCcore-4.9.3/lib/libbfd-2.25.so (0x00002b09d3247000) libfl.so.2 => /user/scratch/gent/vsc400/vsc40023/easybuild_REGTEST/SL6/sandybridge/software/flex/2.5.39-GCCcore-4.9.3/lib/libfl.so.2 (0x00002b09d337e000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002b09d3656000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002b09d38db000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00002b09d3af8000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b09d3cfc000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00002b09d3225000)

any ideas @wpoely86?

ocaisa · 2016-02-29T16:27:18Z

easybuild/easyconfigs/m/M4/M4-1.4.17-GCCcore-5.3.0.eb

+source_urls = [GNU_SOURCE]
+
+# use same binutils version that was used when building GCC toolchain
+builddependencies = [('binutils', '2.25', '', True)]


version 2.26

nice catch btw :)

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-29T19:46:13Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6664/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2016-02-29T20:10:31Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/6665/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-03-14T17:49:17Z

So, two options here: I rework this to (or open a new PR for) GCC/5.3.0-2.25 (i.e. downgrade to the binutils/2.25 we already have), and use that as a base for intel/2016.02* (i.e. #2523 and #2620), or I postpone this until after the EB v2.7.0 release (which implies not including easyconfigs for the latest Intel compilers in EB v2.7.0)...

Thoughts @wpoely86, @ocaisa?

ocaisa · 2016-03-14T18:26:56Z

What about just reworking #2620 as a 4.9.3-2.25 branch of the latest intel compilers and holding off on the 5.3.0-2.26 branch?

boegel · 2016-03-14T18:31:08Z

@ocaisa That's a good suggestion... I'll look into that.

hpcugentbot · 2016-05-04T07:46:48Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7889/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

hpcugentbot · 2016-05-04T11:50:15Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite FAILed.

See https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7890/console for more details.

Please fix the reported issues by pushing additional commits to the branch corresponding with this pull request; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-05-07T17:05:51Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2159.delcatty.os - Linux SL 6.7, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/c9d7cc77943cde2aa62213f5057ba102 for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-05-07T21:22:44Z

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2474.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.2.1511, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/60e51e381911bdf402705c7d2d8e9e7a for a full test report.

boegel · 2016-05-09T09:09:06Z

Jenkins: test this please

hpcugentbot · 2016-05-09T09:26:08Z

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/7915/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

boegel · 2016-05-09T09:45:20Z

(finally) good to go now that the binutils easyblock is there, cfr easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#907

Thanks for the review and feedback @wpoely86 and @ocaisa!

{compiler}[dummp] GCC 5.3.0-2.26

0907ea3

boegel added this to the v2.7.0 milestone Feb 18, 2016

boegel mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2016

{toolchain}[dummy] intel 2016.02-GCC-5.3 (REVIEW) #2523

Merged

boegel changed the title ~~{compiler}[dummp] GCC 5.3.0-2.26 (REVIEW)~~ {compiler}[dummy] GCC 5.3.0-2.26 (REVIEW) Feb 19, 2016

non-parallel build of flex 2.6.0

b0d79ea

boegel mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2016

EasyBuild 2.7.0 (roadmap) easybuilders/easybuild#192

Closed

17 tasks

add binutils as dependency in flex easyconfig

b0d06e6

wpoely86 reviewed Feb 29, 2016
View reviewed changes

ocaisa reviewed Feb 29, 2016
View reviewed changes

boegel added 2 commits February 29, 2016 19:56

fix binutils version in M4 easyconfig

a13cd4a

fix source URL for GCC tarball in GCCcore easyconfig

56f9e64

boegel mentioned this pull request Mar 2, 2016

{toolchain}[dummy] intel/2016.02-GCC-4.9 #2620

Merged

boegel modified the milestones: v2.8.0, v2.7.0 Mar 14, 2016

boegel mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2016

EasyBuild v2.8.0 (roadmap) easybuilders/easybuild#209

Closed

7 tasks

boegel mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2016

binutils with foss 2016a #2878

Closed

Merge branch 'develop' into GCC530_226

1c9267d

boegel mentioned this pull request May 4, 2016

add easyblock for binutils (REVIEW) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#907

Merged

clean up binutils 2.26 easyconfigs to use binutils easyblock

596390a

This was referenced May 9, 2016

{toolchain}[dummy] intel/2016.03-GCC-5.3 #3009

Merged

{toolchain}[dummy] foss/2016.04 #3013

Merged

boegel merged commit ad2dfdb into easybuilders:develop May 9, 2016

boegel deleted the GCC530_226 branch May 9, 2016 09:46

{compiler}[dummy] GCC 5.3.0-2.26 (REVIEW) #2524

{compiler}[dummy] GCC 5.3.0-2.26 (REVIEW) #2524

Uh oh!

Conversation

boegel commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 18, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 19, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 19, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 19, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 19, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 19, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 19, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 19, 2016

Uh oh!

ocaisa commented Feb 20, 2016

Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 27, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 27, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 27, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 27, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 27, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 27, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Feb 27, 2016

Uh oh!

wpoely86 Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ocaisa Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel Feb 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 29, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented Feb 29, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Mar 14, 2016

Uh oh!

ocaisa commented Mar 14, 2016

Uh oh!

boegel commented Mar 14, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented May 4, 2016

Uh oh!

hpcugentbot commented May 4, 2016