Skip to content

anagram: Remove comment from canonical data #1280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2018

Conversation

m-dango
Copy link
Member

@m-dango m-dango commented Aug 1, 2018

The comment is referring to a string argument cases key which was removed in PR #308

Copy link
Member

@rpottsoh rpottsoh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. Thanks. 👍

@m-dango m-dango merged commit 50631fd into exercism:master Aug 1, 2018
@m-dango m-dango deleted the remove-anagram-comment branch August 1, 2018 15:38
petertseng pushed a commit to exercism/haskell that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
Addresses exercism/problem-specifications#1348

The two unaccounted version bumps are no-ops:
 - 1.2.0 -> 1.2.1: A comment was changed in [1].
 - 1.2.1 -> 1.3.0: The `property` value was changed from `anagrams` to
   `findAnagrams` in [2], but we call this function `anagramsFor`, so it
   seems that we don't aim for conformity here.

[1]: exercism/problem-specifications@725b767
[2]: exercism/problem-specifications@3faf343

exercism/problem-specifications#1280
exercism/problem-specifications#1301
petertseng pushed a commit to petertseng/exercism-ceylon that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2018
The logical extension of Banana not being an anagram of BANANA must be
that words are never anagrams of themselves, and that the test "capital
word is not own anagram" only tests this for case insensitivity.

1.2.1: no-op, comment change
exercism/problem-specifications#1280
1.3.0: no-op, property change
exercism/problem-specifications#1301
1.4.0: case-insensitive
exercism/problem-specifications#1348
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants