Skip to content

Latest prebuild timestamp is inaccurate on the project card #5518

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
gtsiolis opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #5961
Closed

Latest prebuild timestamp is inaccurate on the project card #5518

gtsiolis opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #5961
Assignees
Labels
component: dashboard feature: prebuilds feature: teams and projects [DEPRECATED] Please, use feature: organizations or feature: projects labels instead. team: webapp Issue belongs to the WebApp team type: improvement Improves an existing feature or existing code

Comments

@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor

gtsiolis commented Sep 3, 2021

Problem to solve

The latest prebuild timestamp information on the project cards is inaccurate. See screenshot below where a prebuild was triggerred an hour ago while the latest prebuild timestamp reads 14 hours ago.

Example Card Example Latest Peebuild
Screenshot 2021-09-03 at 1 46 21 PM Screenshot 2021-09-03 at 1 46 23 PM (2)
@gtsiolis gtsiolis added component: dashboard feature: prebuilds type: improvement Improves an existing feature or existing code feature: teams and projects [DEPRECATED] Please, use feature: organizations or feature: projects labels instead. labels Sep 3, 2021
@svenefftinge
Copy link
Member

What I missed is the meta information (repository link) on the overview page of a project. I know we don't have one but maybe we can add the repo URL to the description header?

@gtsiolis gtsiolis changed the title Later prebuild timestamp is inaccurate on the project card Latest prebuild timestamp is inaccurate on the project card Sep 3, 2021
@gtsiolis
Copy link
Contributor Author

gtsiolis commented Sep 3, 2021

I know we don't have one but maybe we can add the repo URL to the description header?

The repository link is already in the header but we recently masked it behind the project name for brevity and scalability. Do you think using the full URL would be better here? 🙈

A (Current) B
header-a header-b

@csweichel
Copy link
Contributor

/team meta

@roboquat roboquat added the team: webapp Issue belongs to the WebApp team label Sep 28, 2021
@svenefftinge
Copy link
Member

/schedule

@roboquat
Copy link
Contributor

@svenefftinge: Issue scheduled in the meta team (WIP: 0)

In response to this:

/schedule

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: dashboard feature: prebuilds feature: teams and projects [DEPRECATED] Please, use feature: organizations or feature: projects labels instead. team: webapp Issue belongs to the WebApp team type: improvement Improves an existing feature or existing code
Projects
No open projects
Status: Needed for shipping 🚢
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants