[preview] Apply gitpod/monitoring-satellite resources if there's diff

[vulkoingim]

Description

Apply gitpod/monitoring-satellite resources only if there's a diff with the one in the cluster. Fixes some issues where resources exist when applied twice, and also should speed up the process somewhat

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

How to test

Release Notes

NONE

Documentation

Build Options:

• /werft with-github-actions
  Experimental feature to run the build with GitHub Actions (and not in Werft).
• leeway-no-cache
  leeway-target=components:all
• /werft no-test
  Run Leeway with --dont-test

Publish Options

• /werft publish-to-npm
• /werft publish-to-jb-marketplace

Installer Options

• with-ee-license
• with-slow-database
• with-dedicated-emulation
• with-ws-manager-mk2
• workspace-feature-flags
  Add desired feature flags to the end of the line above, space separated

Preview Environment Options:

• /werft with-local-preview
  If enabled this will build install/preview
• /werft with-preview
• /werft with-large-vm
• /werft with-gce-vm
  If enabled this will create the environment on GCE infra
• /werft with-integration-tests=all
  Valid options are all, workspace, webapp, ide, jetbrains, vscode, ssh

[werft-gitpod-dev-com]

started the job as gitpod-build-aa-deploy.6 because the annotations in the pull request description changed
(with .werft/ from main)

[mads-hartmann]

Thanks!

[werft-gitpod-dev-com]

started the job as gitpod-build-aa-deploy.7 because the annotations in the pull request description changed
(with .werft/ from main)

[iQQBot]

I think this PR brings more instability to the preview env, and there may be competition between them

[iQQBot]

This is a brand new instance, nothing has been rendered, but some of them have produced no diff, which proves that many have been applied multiple times

[iQQBot]

if you see github action, there are lots of preview env created that failed because of this.

[iQQBot]

Should we revert this PR? this PR block #16523 cc @mads-hartmann because @vulkoingim is OOO

[mads-hartmann]

@iQQBot Let's revert it - if you create a PR I can approve the changes to get it through ☺️ Then @vulkoingim can debug further when he gets back ☺️