Skip to content

[API] dont reqToken on GetReactions (fix #9543) #9548

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 2, 2020

Conversation

6543
Copy link
Member

@6543 6543 commented Dec 30, 2019

fix #9543

@6543 6543 changed the title dont reqToken on GetReactions [API] dont reqToken on GetReactions Dec 30, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 30, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #9548 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 60%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9548      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.15%   42.16%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         577      577              
  Lines       75982    75982              
==========================================
+ Hits        32027    32039      +12     
+ Misses      39979    39969      -10     
+ Partials     3976     3974       -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_reaction.go 75.27% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
routers/api/v1/api.go 73.92% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
models/pull.go 46.54% <0%> (+0.48%) ⬆️
services/pull/check.go 55.63% <0%> (+2.11%) ⬆️
services/pull/temp_repo.go 34.18% <0%> (+2.56%) ⬆️
modules/process/manager.go 78.31% <0%> (+3.61%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b3c5b4b...33bf7dc. Read the comment docs.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Dec 30, 2019
@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

I think you need to take a look at:

if !ctx.Repo.CanRead(models.UnitTypeIssues) && !ctx.User.IsAdmin {

Looking at:

}, mustEnableIssuesOrPulls)

I don't think you need the check in issue_reaction.go - and if you're anonymous then I suspect that ctx.User.IsAdmin might cause a nil pointer.

@6543 6543 changed the title [API] dont reqToken on GetReactions [API] dont reqToken on GetReactions (fix #9543) Dec 30, 2019
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Dec 30, 2019

@zeripath done

@lafriks lafriks added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Dec 30, 2019
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.11.0 milestone Dec 30, 2019
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Dec 30, 2019

@lafriks does this https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/9548/files#diff-029cb1fefb1ae53a0ef72d3fd38a7f7dR16 resolfe your permission issue ?

-> I created a new file to make it reusable ...

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 1, 2020

@zeripath !ctx.Repo.CanRead(models.UnitTypeIssues) && !ctx.User.IsAdmin works without login -> if issue is public, it works if not 404 is returned

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 2, 2020

I think we should keep !ctx.Repo.CanRead(models.UnitTypeIssues) and remove !ctx.User.IsAdmin, because the previous has included the next. And ctx.User may be nil.

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 2, 2020

@lunny is this what you mean? fdf7965

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 2, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 2, 2020
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 2, 2020

ready to merge 🚀

@lafriks lafriks merged commit 134e3fd into go-gitea:master Jan 2, 2020
@6543 6543 deleted the fix-9543 branch January 2, 2020 21:32
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request] Allow GET comments reactions without token via API
6 participants