Skip to content

[SYCL][FPGA] Remove support for intel::fpga_pipeline attribute #6519

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 4, 2022

Conversation

smanna12
Copy link
Contributor

@smanna12 smanna12 commented Aug 2, 2022

Support for new FPGA attribute called [[intel::fpga_pipeline(N)]]
added on #6254 is no longer needed.

This patch removes the support from frontend.

Signed-off-by: Soumi Manna [email protected]

Support for new FPGA attribute called [[intel::fpga_pipeline(N)]]
on intel#6254 is no longer needed.

This patch removes the support from frontend.

Signed-off-by: Soumi Manna <[email protected]>
@smanna12 smanna12 marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2022 22:54
@smanna12 smanna12 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 2, 2022 22:54
@smanna12 smanna12 requested a review from mendell27 August 2, 2022 22:55
@smanna12
Copy link
Contributor Author

smanna12 commented Aug 3, 2022

The failure is unrelated to my patch:


Unresolved Tests (1):
SYCL :: Assert/assert_in_simultaneous_kernels.cpp
https://github.com/intel/llvm/runs/7642204197?check_suite_focus=true

@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Aug 3, 2022

The failure is unrelated to my patch:

Unresolved Tests (1): SYCL :: Assert/assert_in_simultaneous_kernels.cpp https://github.com/intel/llvm/runs/7642204197?check_suite_focus=true

Most likely it's caused by ade1870. @npmiller, could you take a look, please?

@npmiller
Copy link
Contributor

npmiller commented Aug 3, 2022

Yeah it's likely related, I'll investigate further, in the meantime to unblock the CI I filed a PR to revert the test to unsupported and filed a ticket to track it:

Sorry about that!

Signed-off-by: Soumi Manna <[email protected]>
@smanna12 smanna12 requested a review from premanandrao August 3, 2022 13:00
Copy link
Contributor

@elizabethandrews elizabethandrews left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I compared this PR to 6254 and I see some code you added in SemaDeclAttr.cpp to deprecate [[intel::disable_loop_pipelining]] attribute spelling in favor of [[intel::fpga_pipeline]]. Shouldn't we remove that code as well. Also, now that [[intel::fpga_pipeline]] s removed how are we handling [[intel::disable_loop_pipelining]]?

@smanna12
Copy link
Contributor Author

smanna12 commented Aug 3, 2022

I compared this PR to 6254 and I see some code you added in SemaDeclAttr.cpp to deprecate [[intel::disable_loop_pipelining]] attribute spelling in favor of [[intel::fpga_pipeline]]. Shouldn't we remove that code as well. Also, now that [[intel::fpga_pipeline]] s removed how are we handling [[intel::disable_loop_pipelining]]?

Thanks @elizabethandrews for reviews. It has been handled as per #6404

@elizabethandrews
Copy link
Contributor

I compared this PR to 6254 and I see some code you added in SemaDeclAttr.cpp to deprecate [[intel::disable_loop_pipelining]] attribute spelling in favor of [[intel::fpga_pipeline]]. Shouldn't we remove that code as well. Also, now that [[intel::fpga_pipeline]] s removed how are we handling [[intel::disable_loop_pipelining]]?

Thanks @elizabethandrews for reviews. It has been handled as per #6404

Thank you for clarifying

@smanna12
Copy link
Contributor Author

smanna12 commented Aug 3, 2022

ping @mendell27

@bader bader merged commit 6fe90d2 into intel:sycl Aug 4, 2022
@smanna12
Copy link
Contributor Author

smanna12 commented Aug 4, 2022

Thank you everyone for the review.

raaiq1 pushed a commit to raaiq1/llvm that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2022
…#6519)

Support for new FPGA attribute called [[intel::fpga_pipeline(N)]]
on intel#6254 is no longer needed.

This patch removes the support from frontend.

Signed-off-by: Soumi Manna <[email protected]>
aelovikov-intel added a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2022
Git's automatic merge didn't do that for some reason. Removed in intel#6519.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants