-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 315
Clarify trailing slash ref-resolution weirdness #678
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the other instance of a trailing slash, you added a note stating that it was included intentionally to show its confusing nature. Is this one also intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was for the
"href": "../api"
line, not the base. I'll try to make that more clear.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gregsdennis reworked it with more detail, see if that makes sense now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So base URIs require trailing slashes so that relative URIs can be resolved against them. Is there any concern about attempting to resolve one relative URI against another?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is all RFC 3986 stuff, nothing is required. But OpenAPI and other systems have, very annoyingly, messed up their concept of a base URI so that it is concatenation instead of reference resolution, and if you do that with reference resolution nothing will work right. You can go look at OpenAPI if you want to dig into it.
This is why I hate writing examples. How much of RFC 3986 do I need to explain here? That is not a rhetorical question. Something needs to be explained because popular formats have done it wrong, but I do not want to put a whole URI reference resolution tutorial here. It's an incredibly complicated process if you go into all of it, but in practice it's mostly pretty straightforward except for the slash thing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd rather not...
👍