-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 304
🐛 fix: use machine's .spec.failureDomain with fallback to vspheremachine's .spec.failureDomain if not defined #3576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Welcome @jcpowermac! |
Hi @jcpowermac. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/lgtm /assign @sbueringer |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 29283286600b1e3b812f33127e495556fc7d4a05
|
5e4caa9
to
e4395a0
Compare
e4395a0
to
53134e4
Compare
This commit sets failureDomain string defaulting to `machine.Spec.FailureDomain`. If failureDomain is an empty string then `vsphereMachine.Spec.FailureDomain` is checked for nil, if defined `failureDomain` is set to `vsphereMachine.Spec.FailureDomain`. This resolves an issue where virtual machines are not placed within vm-host groups in a timely manner causing misplacement in the topology.
53134e4
to
0b469d3
Compare
@chrischdi @sbueringer updated per comments ptal, thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 703f4d802e96bfb1b8c05d1eae9d5e9398b4156d
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Thanks for bringing this up 🎉 |
/lgtm |
/cherry-pick release-1.14 |
@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@sbueringer: new pull request created: #3587 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/retitle 🐛 fix: use machine's .spec.failureDomain with fallback to vspheremachine's .spec.failureDomain if not defined |
/cherry-pick release-1.13 |
/cherry-pick release-1.12 |
@chrischdi: #3576 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.13":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@chrischdi: #3576 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.12":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This commit sets failureDomain string defaulting to
machine.Spec.FailureDomain
. If failureDomainis an empty string then
vsphereMachine.Spec.FailureDomain
ischecked for nil, if defined
failureDomain
is setto
vsphereMachine.Spec.FailureDomain
.This resolves an issue where virtual machines are not placed
within vm-host groups in a timely
manner causing misplacement in the topology.
Fixes #3575