-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
[lldb][Docs] Document our major differences from the LLVM style #66345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb ChangesRunning: $ clang-format -iResulted in: The vast majority of which were whitespace changes. So as far as formatting we're not deviating from llvm for any reason other than not churning old code. Formatting aside, the major features of lldb (single line if, early return) are all reflected in llvm's stype. We differ mainly on variable naming (proposed to change in https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VariableNames.html anyway) and use of asserts. Which was already documented.Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66345.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/docs/resources/contributing.rst b/lldb/docs/resources/contributing.rst index 54917f1ce8175b3..9b133706a7fd160 100644 --- a/lldb/docs/resources/contributing.rst +++ b/lldb/docs/resources/contributing.rst @@ -18,19 +18,38 @@ Please refer to the `LLVM Developer Policy authoring and uploading a patch. LLDB differs from the LLVM Developer Policy in the following respects. - - **Test infrastructure**: Like LLVM it is important to submit tests with your - patches, but note that LLDB uses a different system for tests. Refer to the - `test documentation <test.html>`_ for more details and the ``lldb/test`` - folder on disk for examples. - - - **Coding Style**: LLDB's code style differs from - `LLVM's coding style <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html>`_. - Unfortunately there is no document describing the differences. Please be - consistent with the existing code. - For anything not explicitly listed here, assume that LLDB follows the LLVM policy. +Coding Style +++++++++++++ + +LLDB's code style differs from `LLVM's coding style <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html>`_ +in a few ways. The 2 main ones are: + +* `Variable naming <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly>`_: + LLDB prefers variables to be ``named_like_this`` and uses the ``m_`` prefix for + member variables. + +* `Use of asserts <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#assert-liberally>`_: + See the :ref:`section below<Error Handling>`. + +For any other contradications please follow the existing code's style. + +Code in LLDB does aim to conform to clang-format but older code may not yet. As +always, consider the `golden rule <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#introduction>`_ +when working with such code. Reformatting before starting work is one possible +option. + +Test Infrastructure ++++++++++++++++++++ + +Like LLVM it is important to submit tests with your patches, but note that LLDB +uses a different system for tests. Refer to the `test documentation <test.html>`_ +for more details and the `lldb/test <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/lldb/test>`_ +folder for examples. + +.. _Error handling: Error handling and use of assertions in LLDB -------------------------------------------- |
@bulbazord This would be a good place to put your plugin dependency / const string guidance. Or tell me where it lives now and I'll link to it. |
If anyone knows the other big differences I'll add them. This is what I came up with from my experience and reading the lllvm style doc. |
Running: $ clang-format -i $(find -regex "\./lldb/.*\.c") $(find -regex "\./lldb/.*\.cpp") $(find -regex "\./lldb/.*\.h") Resulted in: 1602 files changed, 25090 insertions(+), 25849 deletions(-) (note: this includes tests which we wouldn't format, just using this as an example) The vast majority of which were whitespace changes. So as far as formatting we're not deviating from llvm for any reason other than not churning old code. Formatting aside, the major features of lldb (single line if, early return) are all reflected in llvm's style. We differ mainly on variable naming (proposed to change in https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VariableNames.html anyway) and use of asserts. Which was already documented.
ef69e33
to
bcabec9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent write up, thanks for taking care of that!
Oh, yes! I'd be happy to take care of that after this goes in, thanks for pointing that out! :) |
* Moved lldbassert() deprecation to a note. * Show variable naming formats using the name of the format e.g. snake_case. * Note other variable prefixes. * Strengthen statement on clang-format. * Only refer to API tests in test section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this!
Running:
$ clang-format -i $(find -regex "./lldb/..c") $(find -regex "./lldb/..cpp") $(find -regex "./lldb/.*.h")
Resulted in:
1602 files changed, 25090 insertions(+), 25849 deletions(-)
(note: this includes tests which we wouldn't format, just using this as an example)
The vast majority of which were whitespace changes. So as far as formatting we're not deviating from llvm for any reason other than not churning old code.
Formatting aside, the major features of lldb (single line if, early return) are all reflected in llvm's style. We differ mainly on variable naming (proposed to change in https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VariableNames.html anyway) and use of asserts. Which was already documented.