-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Add ConstantRangeList::subtract(ConstantRange) #97093
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-ir Author: Haopeng Liu (haopliu) ChangesAdd ConstantRangeList::subtract(ConstantRange). This API will be used in the "initializes" attribute inference as well (for load instructions). Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97093.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/ConstantRangeList.h b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/ConstantRangeList.h
index 46edaff19e73f..9aae52dac130e 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/IR/ConstantRangeList.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/IR/ConstantRangeList.h
@@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ class [[nodiscard]] ConstantRangeList {
APInt(64, Upper, /*isSigned=*/true)));
}
+ void subtract(const ConstantRange &SubRange);
+ void subtract(int64_t Lower, int64_t Upper) {
+ subtract(ConstantRange(APInt(64, Lower, /*isSigned=*/true),
+ APInt(64, Upper, /*isSigned=*/true)));
+ }
+
/// Return the range list that results from the union of this
/// ConstantRangeList with another ConstantRangeList, "CRL".
ConstantRangeList unionWith(const ConstantRangeList &CRL) const;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/ConstantRangeList.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/ConstantRangeList.cpp
index 0373524a09f10..2db5de86b3c76 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/ConstantRangeList.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/ConstantRangeList.cpp
@@ -81,6 +81,65 @@ void ConstantRangeList::insert(const ConstantRange &NewRange) {
}
}
+void ConstantRangeList::subtract(const ConstantRange &SubRange) {
+ if (SubRange.isEmptySet())
+ return;
+ assert(!SubRange.isFullSet() && "Do not support full set");
+ assert(SubRange.getLower().slt(SubRange.getUpper()));
+ assert(getBitWidth() == SubRange.getBitWidth());
+ // Handle common cases.
+ if (empty() || Ranges.back().getUpper().sle(SubRange.getLower())) {
+ return;
+ }
+ if (SubRange.getUpper().sle(Ranges.front().getLower())) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ SmallVector<ConstantRange, 2> Result;
+ auto AppendRange = [&Result](APInt Start, APInt End) {
+ if (Start.slt(End))
+ Result.push_back(ConstantRange(Start, End));
+ };
+ for (auto &Range : Ranges) {
+ if (SubRange.getUpper().sle(Range.getLower()) ||
+ Range.getUpper().sle(SubRange.getLower())) {
+ // "Range" and "SubRange" do not overlap.
+ // L---U : Range
+ // L---U : SubRange (Case1)
+ // L---U : SubRange (Case2)
+ Result.push_back(Range);
+ } else if (Range.getLower().sle(SubRange.getLower()) &&
+ SubRange.getUpper().sle(Range.getUpper())) {
+ // "Range" contains "SubRange".
+ // L---U : Range
+ // L-U : SubRange
+ // Note that ConstantRange::contains(ConstantRange) checks unsigned,
+ // but we need signed checking here.
+ AppendRange(Range.getLower(), SubRange.getLower());
+ AppendRange(SubRange.getUpper(), Range.getUpper());
+ } else if (SubRange.getLower().sle(Range.getLower()) &&
+ Range.getUpper().sle(SubRange.getUpper())) {
+ // "SubRange" contains "Range".
+ // L-U : Range
+ // L---U : SubRange
+ continue;
+ } else if (Range.getLower().sge(SubRange.getLower()) &&
+ Range.getLower().sle(SubRange.getUpper())) {
+ // "Range" and "SubRange" overlap at the left.
+ // L---U : Range
+ // L---U : SubRange
+ AppendRange(SubRange.getUpper(), Range.getUpper());
+ } else {
+ // "Range" and "SubRange" overlap at the right.
+ // L---U : Range
+ // L---U : SubRange
+ AppendRange(Range.getLower(), SubRange.getLower());
+ }
+ }
+
+ Ranges.assign(Result.begin(), Result.end());
+}
+
ConstantRangeList
ConstantRangeList::unionWith(const ConstantRangeList &CRL) const {
assert(getBitWidth() == CRL.getBitWidth() &&
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeListTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeListTest.cpp
index b679dd3a33d5d..da3cb330871b3 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeListTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantRangeListTest.cpp
@@ -101,6 +101,50 @@ ConstantRangeList GetCRL(ArrayRef<std::pair<APInt, APInt>> Pairs) {
return ConstantRangeList(Ranges);
}
+TEST_F(ConstantRangeListTest, Subtract) {
+ APInt AP0 = APInt(64, 0, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ APInt AP2 = APInt(64, 2, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ APInt AP3 = APInt(64, 3, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ APInt AP4 = APInt(64, 4, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ APInt AP8 = APInt(64, 8, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ APInt AP10 = APInt(64, 10, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ APInt AP11 = APInt(64, 11, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ APInt AP12 = APInt(64, 12, /*isSigned=*/true);
+ ConstantRangeList CRL = GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}, {AP8, AP12}});
+
+ // Execute ConstantRangeList::subtract(ConstantRange) and check the result
+ // is expected. Pass "CRL" by value so that subtract() does not affect the
+ // argument in caller.
+ auto SubtractAndCheck = [](ConstantRangeList CRL,
+ const std::pair<int64_t, int64_t> &Range,
+ const ConstantRangeList &ExpectedCRL) {
+ CRL.subtract(Range.first, Range.second);
+ EXPECT_EQ(CRL, ExpectedCRL);
+ };
+
+ // No overlap
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {-4, 0}, CRL);
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {4, 8}, CRL);
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {12, 16}, CRL);
+
+ // Overlap (left or right)
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {-4, 2}, GetCRL({{AP2, AP4}, {AP8, AP12}}));
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {-4, 4}, GetCRL({{AP8, AP12}}));
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {-4, 8}, GetCRL({{AP8, AP12}}));
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {10, 16}, GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}, {AP8, AP10}}));
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {8, 16}, GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}}));
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {6, 16}, GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}}));
+
+ // Subset
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {2, 3}, GetCRL({{AP0, AP2}, {AP3, AP4}, {AP8, AP12}}));
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {10, 11},
+ GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}, {AP8, AP10}, {AP11, AP12}}));
+
+ // Superset
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {0, 12}, GetCRL({}));
+ SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {-4, 16}, GetCRL({}));
+}
+
TEST_F(ConstantRangeListTest, Union) {
APInt APN4 = APInt(64, -4, /*isSigned=*/true);
APInt APN2 = APInt(64, -2, /*isSigned=*/true);
|
@@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ class [[nodiscard]] ConstantRangeList { | |||
APInt(64, Upper, /*isSigned=*/true))); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
void subtract(const ConstantRange &SubRange); | |||
void subtract(int64_t Lower, int64_t Upper) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this mostly to simplify the test (line 121 in the test.cpp?)?
It might be better to put this logic in the test file instead (could be inlined into the line 121 area?), so that there is (a) smaller public API (b) less int64_t specific APIs (while the rest seem to be more generic regarding bitwidth)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sense. Deleted the API.
|
||
SmallVector<ConstantRange, 2> Result; | ||
auto AppendRange = [&Result](APInt Start, APInt End) { | ||
if (Start.slt(End)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
might be helpful to have brief comment "append new range if not empty" (was initially less clear why the slt check)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd rename this to AppendRangeIfNonEmpty
or something like that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renamed!
for (auto &Range : Ranges) { | ||
if (SubRange.getUpper().sle(Range.getLower()) || | ||
Range.getUpper().sle(SubRange.getLower())) { | ||
// "Range" and "SubRange" do not overlap. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice explanations =)
SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {-4, 8}, GetCRL({{AP8, AP12}})); | ||
SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {10, 16}, GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}, {AP8, AP10}})); | ||
SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {8, 16}, GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}})); | ||
SubtractAndCheck(CRL, {6, 16}, GetCRL({{AP0, AP4}})); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe try touching at the other ends like {0, X} and {X, 12} too
(vs {X, 4} and {8, X})?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done! Added another case {2, 10} that overlaps multiple ranges.
llvm/lib/IR/ConstantRangeList.cpp
Outdated
// Handle common cases. | ||
if (empty() || Ranges.back().getUpper().sle(SubRange.getLower())) { | ||
return; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
llvm/lib/IR/ConstantRangeList.cpp
Outdated
if (empty() || Ranges.back().getUpper().sle(SubRange.getLower())) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
if (SubRange.getUpper().sle(Ranges.front().getLower())) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems weird to combine the empty plus first range check into one if statement but keep the second range check separate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, nice catch. Combined the CRL empty check and the "SubRange" empty check together.
llvm/lib/IR/ConstantRangeList.cpp
Outdated
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
Ranges.assign(Result.begin(), Result.end()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is Ranges = Result;
simpler?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep!
|
||
SmallVector<ConstantRange, 2> Result; | ||
auto AppendRange = [&Result](APInt Start, APInt End) { | ||
if (Start.slt(End)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd rename this to AppendRangeIfNonEmpty
or something like that
// L---U : SubRange | ||
AppendRangeIfNonEmpty(SubRange.getUpper(), Range.getUpper()); | ||
} else { | ||
// "Range" and "SubRange" overlap at the right. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add an assert for this
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/961 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference:
|
Add ConstantRangeList::subtract(ConstantRange). This API will be used in the "initializes" attribute inference as well (for load instructions).
Add ConstantRangeList::subtract(ConstantRange).
This API will be used in the "initializes" attribute inference as well (for load instructions).