Skip to content

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #6450

Will hopefully prevent other issues similar to #6426 in the future.

Proposes the following:

  • modifying all the dockerfiles so that they at least build successfully on x86_64
  • replacing hard-coded architectures with $(arch) so the dockerfiles can be built on aarch64
  • adding a new CI job that tests that all the images at least build without error

Notes for Reviewers

This is not ready for review.

As I work on this, I'll try to break off some pieces into other PRs to keep this from getting too big. Just opening this to show that I'm working on it.

@StrikerRUS
Copy link
Collaborator

What about publishing these images somewhere? Eg. DockerHub, ghcr.io or quay.io. Do you think users need them?..

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What about publishing these images somewhere? Eg. DockerHub, ghcr.io or quay.io. Do you think users need them?..

I don't think we should pursue pre-building the images and publishing them somewhere right now.

I think that's a little too heavy for a single library like lightgbm, and I don't think there are enough active maintainers here right now to manage a new set of artifacts like that. I think it's enough for now for these Dockerfiles to serve as source code that people can use to build their own images.

@StrikerRUS
Copy link
Collaborator

Fair enough! Agree with you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[docker] Update Tutorial for Installing LightGBM GPU on Docker Environment
2 participants