Re-enable fused matmul rules

[bmehta001]

Enable fused matmul rules again, since they were commented out

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Re-enables the previously commented-out fused MatMul rewrite rules and updates a typo in its docstring.

• Correct the docstring from “contrib obs” to “contrib ops” and fix indentation.
• Import and include the fused_matmul_rule_sets rules in the core fusion rule list.
• Remove the old commented-out invocation and replace it with the active rule set.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
onnxscript/rewriter/ort_fusions/fused_matmul_rule_sets.py	Updated docstring and re-enabled fused MatMul rules
onnxscript/rewriter/ort_fusions/_core.py	Imported and added the fused_matmul rules to list

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

onnxscript/rewriter/ort_fusions/_core.py:41

• Newly re-enabled fused MatMul rules aren’t covered by existing tests. Please add unit or integration tests to verify these rules are applied correctly during model rewriting.

*fused_matmul_rule_sets.fused_matmul_rule_sets().rules,

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.14%. Comparing base (cabd83b) to head (2a557ae).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2370   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.13%   70.14%           
=======================================
  Files         197      197           
  Lines       24982    24983    +1     
  Branches     2667     2667           
=======================================
+ Hits        17522    17525    +3     
+ Misses       6532     6531    -1     
+ Partials      928      927    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.