Remove getCluster method #1245
Merged
Remove getCluster method #1245
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
from the following internal interfaces: * ClusterAwareReadWriteBinding * AsyncClusterAwareReadWriteBinding The interfaces remain as they have picket up a second method. JAVA-5217
jyemin
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2023
from the following internal interfaces: * ClusterAwareReadWriteBinding * AsyncClusterAwareReadWriteBinding The interfaces remain as they have picket up a second method. JAVA-5217
jyemin
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
from the following internal interfaces: * ClusterAwareReadWriteBinding * AsyncClusterAwareReadWriteBinding The interfaces remain as they have picket up a second method. JAVA-5217
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
from the following internal interfaces:
The interfaces remain, as they have picket up a second method. The existing interface names arguably still make sense since implementations have to be "cluster-aware" in order to implement the remaining method.
JAVA-5217