-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
Add property-based testing to temporal-types conversion #997
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
bigmontz
merged 6 commits into
neo4j:5.0
from
bigmontz:5.0-add-property-based-testing-to-temporal-types
Sep 19, 2022
Merged
Add property-based testing to temporal-types conversion #997
bigmontz
merged 6 commits into
neo4j:5.0
from
bigmontz:5.0-add-property-based-testing-to-temporal-types
Sep 19, 2022
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this type of testing to `.toStandardDate()` ('should be the reverse operation of fromStandardDate but losing time information') helps to cover corner cases and solve special cases such: * Negative date time not being serialized correctly in the iso standard. Years should always have 6 digits and the signal in front for working correctly with negative years and high numbers. This also avoids the year 2000 problem. See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 * `Date.fromStandardDate` factory was not taking in consideration the `seconds` contribuition in the timezone offset. This is not a quite common scenarion, but there are dates with timezone offset of for example `50 minutes` and `20 seconds`. * Fix `Date.toStandardDate` for dates with offsets of seconds. Javascript Date contructor doesn't create dates from iso strings with seconds in the offset. For instance, `new Date("2010-01-12T14:44:53+00:00:10")`. So, the date should be re-created from the utc timestamp.
fff9c6c
to
2e3a622
Compare
robsdedude
reviewed
Sep 19, 2022
robsdedude
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🕙
robsdedude
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
bigmontz
added a commit
to bigmontz/neo4j-javascript-driver
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2022
Add this type of testing to `.toString()` ('should be serialize string which can be loaded by new Date') helps to cover corner cases and solve special cases such: * Negative date time not being serialised correctly in the iso standard. Years should always have 6 digits and the signal in front for working correctly with negative years and high numbers. This also avoids the year 2000 problem. See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 * `Date.fromStandardDate` factory was not taking in consideration the `seconds` contribution in the timezone offset. This is not a quite common scenario, but there are dates with timezone offset of for example `50 minutes` and `20 seconds`. * Fix `Date.toString` for dates with offsets of seconds. Javascript Date constructor doesn't create dates from iso strings with seconds in the offset. For instance, `new Date("2010-01-12T14:44:53+00:00:10")`. So, this tests should be skipped.
bigmontz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2022
Add this type of testing to `.toString()` ('should be serialize string which can be loaded by new Date') helps to cover corner cases and solve special cases such: * Negative date time not being serialised correctly in the iso standard. Years should always have 6 digits and the signal in front for working correctly with negative years and high numbers. This also avoids the year 2000 problem. See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601 * `Date.fromStandardDate` factory was not taking in consideration the `seconds` contribution in the timezone offset. This is not a quite common scenario, but there are dates with timezone offset of for example `50 minutes` and `20 seconds`. * Fix `Date.toString` for dates with offsets of seconds. Javascript Date constructor doesn't create dates from iso strings with seconds in the offset. For instance, `new Date("2010-01-12T14:44:53+00:00:10")`. So, this tests should be skipped. Co-authored-by: Robsdedude <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add this type of testing to
.toStandardDate()
('should be the reverse operation of fromStandardDate but losing time information') helps to cover corner cases and solve special cases such:Date.fromStandardDate
factory was not taking in consideration theseconds
contribution in the timezone offset. This is not a quite common scenario, but there are dates with timezone offset of for example50 minutes
and20 seconds
.Date.toStandardDate
for dates with offsets of seconds. Javascript Date constructor doesn't create dates from iso strings with seconds in the offset. For instance,new Date("2010-01-12T14:44:53+00:00:10")
. So, the date should be re-created from the UTC timestamp.