Skip to content

[FIX,WIP] Setting inputs.ignore_exception #2412

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 27, 2018
Merged

Conversation

oesteban
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2411

@@ -73,27 +73,27 @@ This will create a file "outputtestsave.py" with the following content:
return out

testfunc.inputs.function_str = getsource(testfunc_1)
testfunc.inputs.ignore_exception = False
testfunc.ignore_exception = False
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.interface?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, and I think that the class attribute does not exist either.

@oesteban oesteban changed the title [FIX] Setting inputs.ignore_exception [FIX,WIP] Setting inputs.ignore_exception Jan 27, 2018
@satra satra merged commit f9809fb into nipy:master Jan 27, 2018
@satra
Copy link
Member

satra commented Jan 27, 2018

@oesteban - sorry i merged this - didn't see the WIP classification. i reverted it.

@satra
Copy link
Member

satra commented Jan 27, 2018

@oesteban - could you please reopen this request. in terms of changes, ignore_exception is an input option in baseinterfaceinputspec. so the changes should be nodename.interface.inputs.ignore_exceotion = ...

@oesteban
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I'll fix the remaining issues now.

@oesteban
Copy link
Contributor Author

Continued in #2414

@effigies effigies added this to the 1.0.1 milestone Aug 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants