Skip to content

Move workflows to a dedicated repository for 3.4 branch #3257

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2022
Merged

Move workflows to a dedicated repository for 3.4 branch #3257

merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2022

Conversation

asenyaev
Copy link
Contributor

@asenyaev asenyaev commented May 19, 2022

Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
  • The PR is proposed to the proper branch
  • There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
  • There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
    Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
  • The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake

@asenyaev asenyaev added the CI/CD: GitHub Actions Changes related to CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions) label May 19, 2022
@asenyaev asenyaev changed the title Draft: Move workflows to a dedicated repository for 3.4 branch Move workflows to a dedicated repository for 3.4 branch May 20, 2022
@opencv-pushbot opencv-pushbot merged commit 8864b30 into opencv:3.4 May 22, 2022
@alalek alalek mentioned this pull request May 23, 2022
@alalek alalek mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI/CD: GitHub Actions Changes related to CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants